Talk:Cantor's first set theory article: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 06:28, 27 January 2023 edit Lowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs) Bots, Page movers 2,449,404 edits m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Cantor's first set theory article/Archive 2) (bot ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:15, 29 January 2024 edit undo Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 8,374,447 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 2 deprecated parameters: field, historical. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 19: \|topic=Mathematics }} {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=GA\| ~~{{Maths rating\|class=GA\|importance=low\|field=foundations\|historical=yes}}~~ {{WikiProject Mathematics\|importance=low}} }} {{User:MiszaBot/config \|archiveheader = {{talkarchive}} Line 120 ⟶ 122: ---- :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves\|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Move review\|move review]]. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> ~~== Constructive? ==~~ The lede text on constructiveness seems a bit confused. There's not clear evidence for a controversy; the only "against" is "Stewart, 2015" but that's not enough to identify who Stewart is. Or who Sheppard 2014 might be. Fraenkel is a heavyweight though so you'd need a good reason to disagree with him [[User:William M. Connolley\|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley\|talk]]) 22:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC) :Those are standard Harvard citations and the sources are listed at the end, so it is clear enough to me what the references point to. There seems to be an entire section of the article related to this issue, with numerous sources. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 15:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC) == A replacement for the removed sentence == Line 275 ⟶ 271: The simplest modification would be to state that these two points are at best the end points. If not the induction actually runs better. [[Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:1203:8500:49CD:D219:D882:A34\|2001:1C02:1203:8500:49CD:D219:D882:A34]] ([[User talk:2001:1C02:1203:8500:49CD:D219:D882:A34\|talk]]) 13:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC) == visited? == "...he second column lists the terms visited during the search for the first two terms..." what do you mean by "terms _visited_"? [[Special:Contributions/217.149.171.204\|217.149.171.204]] ([[User talk:217.149.171.204\|talk]]) 08:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)