Content deleted Content added
Xyzzyplugh (talk | contribs) trying again to add my sig |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=low}}
}}
==Talk==
I removed the following text, as I have no idea what the hell this is, and the article didn't explain. If it is useful, it could be put back, but certainly some explanation would be in order. Here's what I took out:
Line 26 ⟶ 30:
</pre>
--[[User:Xyzzyplugh|Xyzzyplugh]] 18:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
:That's just an example of a connection to a chargen server. It's relevant and edifying, but I don't know if it should be in the article raw like that. [[User:Kundor|Kundor]] 16:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Why did chargen go away?
chargen has a long history of abuse and that's the reason no one uses it anymore. Spoof a packet from an echo service to the chargen service and enjoy the chaos. I don't really know enough to edit the article but the reason for chargen's demise surely belongs on this page. Here's a couple of good sources that document the DoS potential:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1996-01.html
http://www.symantec.com/business/security_response/attacksignatures/detail.jsp?asid=20046
[[Special:Contributions/71.30.145.220|71.30.145.220]] ([[User talk:71.30.145.220|talk]]) 09:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
|