Talk:Coding conventions: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:35, 15 April 2021

Latest revision as of 18:42, 30 January 2024

(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject Computingbanner shell|class=|importance=}}

{{WikiProject Computer Science|class=Computing|importance=}}

{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=}}

}}

== Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language==

Line 18 ⟶ 20:

== Trailing commas ==

Trailing commas redirect here, but the article does not mention them. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.191.75.7|81.191.75.7]] ([[User talk:81.191.75.7|talk]]) 21:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:It does not need to mention it specifically. TCs are part of coding guides, e. g. https://rules.sonarsource.com/c/RSPEC-878 KR {{done}} [[User:17387349L8764|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764|talk]]) 09:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

== Programming style ==

This article overlaps with [[Programming style]] and [[Coding standards]] and has no proper link to de:Programmierstil. I dare not change it, because I cannot decide which of the two articles could go to orcus or if both could get a clear different lemma.--[[User:Brf|Brf]] ([[User talk:Brf|talk]]) 15:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

:Hi, it looks messy yes. Programming style completely lacks references, which is inacceptable IMO. It was created 2003. Coding conventions was created 2006 and looks rather list-style. I think this. The best parts of Programming style should be merged into Coding conventions, into a sub-section "Style" or so WITH fresh referencing. Shocking that nobody answered this comment before or shows interest. If I find time, I come back to this. BR [[User:17387349L8764|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764|talk]]) 09:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

== Refactoring coding conventions and programming style articles ==

Line 29 ⟶ 35:

Also here, any proposals/comments are welcome.

Thanks, [[User:Ptrb|Ptrb]] ([[User talk:Ptrb|talk]]) 07:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC).

:Hi, correct, both pages need merging and updating. See my comment above (Section Programming style). I close this comment which looks like a duplicated-call for action. KR {{done}} [[User:17387349L8764|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764|talk]]) 09:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

=== Proposal 0 ===

Line 143 ⟶ 151:

Any thoughts, rules, practices, do's, don'ts on "meaningful names?" [[User:DEddy|DEddy]] ([[User talk:DEddy|talk]]) 21:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

:Hi, searching article for "Meaningful names" finds 0 results. What do you mean? I close this, your comment wasn't answered for a while. Please open again if needed. KR {{done}} [[User:17387349L8764|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764|talk]]) 09:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

:The name should describe the data in terms the user of the application can understand. For example ‘sample_size” or “median_age” instead of something like ”x”, “ss”, or “med.” Other than that there are a lot of thoughts on what the form of a name should be, for example “pszCustomerName” is Hungarian Notation for a pointer (p) to a null-terminated string (sz) containing a customer name. [[User:Peter Flass|Peter Flass]] ([[User talk:Peter Flass|talk]]) 19:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

== Broken link for reference 1 ==

The reference one lead to a page with broken llnk only, it should be updated. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/199.243.65.6|199.243.65.6]] ([[User talk:199.243.65.6|talk]]) 21:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Please help and update it. Your comment is from 2014, this is too old. Ref 1 is currently working. BR {{done}} [[User:17387349L8764|17387349L8764]] ([[User talk:17387349L8764|talk]]) 09:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

== External links modified ==