Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Color}}. Tag: |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Color|class=C|importance=Mid}}▼
{{AmericanEnglish}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
}}
{{Archive box|search=yes|
* [[Talk:Color_rendering_index/Archive 1|Archive 1]] <small>(Jan 2021)</small>}}
Line 62 ⟶ 64:
== Proposed merge of [[High-CRI LED lighting]] into [[Color rendering index]] ==
{{Discussion top|result=To '''not merge''', but to refine [[High-CRI LED lighting]] to reduce duplication there, then link to this page for more detail. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 10:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)}}
Wide overlap and duplication. [[User:Fgnievinski|fgnievinski]] ([[User talk:Fgnievinski|talk]]) 05:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
:This seems like a bad idea. These are two completely different subjects. One is about a kind of lamps, and the other is about a standard metric by which lamps can be measured. The High-CRI LEDs article should be slimmed down and refocused on the details of the lamps rather than on explaining the CRI. ––[[user:jacobolus|jacobolus]] [[User_talk:jacobolus|(t)]] 07:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
::That makes sense to me--to slim down the high CRI LEDs article and refer readers to this one more as needed. [[User:Ccrrccrr|Ccrrccrr]] ([[User talk:Ccrrccrr|talk]]) 02:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
{{Discussion bottom}}
| |||