Content deleted Content added
→So where do we stand?: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance= }}
{{merged-from|Servant (CORBA)|date=2016-02-13}}
== Interface Definition/Description Language ==
Line 65 ⟶ 68:
::: TAO will soon have a prototype of a STL-based C++ binding [[Special:Contributions/24.132.221.68|24.132.221.68]] ([[User talk:24.132.221.68|talk]]) 19:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
:: I think the list of current uses, like the above with a bit more research put into it, and if available, some sort of estimation of "market share" or "market penetration" would be a good way to balance the perspective of the article while adding to the useful content.([[Special:Contributions/71.233.167.118|71.233.167.118]] ([[User talk:71.233.167.118|talk]]) 13:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC))
: CORBA support is to be removed in Java 11 <ref>http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/320</ref> citing "There is no significant interest in developing modern applications with CORBA in Java." I'd say this is something which should be reflected in the article.
{{reflist-talk}}
==VMCID==
Line 104 ⟶ 111:
I think a code example in one of the languages where the binding is relatively standard, e.g. Java of how CORBA is used would be helpful. Since I don't know that much about how CORBA is used, I don't actually know if that makes sense, but if it does, an example should definitely be in the article. [[User:Subwy|Subwy]] ([[User talk:Subwy|talk]]) 18:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
:This article also needs examples of real life applications using CORBA. --[[User:Abdull|Abdull]] ([[User talk:Abdull|talk]]) 14:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)vnvnc
::Java Enterprise Edition would be the primary example AFAIK. … Al least it was, 20 years ago. :) — [[Special:Contributions/109.42.178.212|109.42.178.212]] ([[User talk:109.42.178.212|talk]]) 13:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
== Update on Compression paragraph? ==
Line 165 ⟶ 173:
* Python ORB - [[Image:50%.svg]] - A Free Software <small>(Python license)</small> ORB implemented in [[Python (programming language)|Python]].
* [http: //www.sankhya.com/info/varadhi.html SANKHYA Varadhi] - [[Image:100%.svg]] - A commercial ORB for [[C++]]
* [http: //www.
* [http: //www.
* [http: //www.martin-both.de/vborb.html VBOrb] - [[Image:100%.svg]] - A Free Software <small>([[GNU Lesser General Public License|LGPL]])</small> ORB for [[Visual Basic]]
* [http: //www.franz.com/support/documentation/5.0.1/orblink/doc/ ORBLink] - A commercial ORB for Allegro Common LISP
* [http: //clorb.sourceforge.net/ CLorb] - for Common Lisp
* [http: //www.
* [http: //www.
* [http: //oil.luaforge.net/ OiL] - A free ORB in [[Lua (programming language)|Lua]], supports currently only part of the CORBA specification
* [http: //forge.morfeo-project.org/projects/tidorbj/ TIDorb for Java] - An open source CORBA 2.6 ORB implementation for Java Language from [http: //morfeo-project.org Morfeo Community]
Line 210 ⟶ 218:
What's the status of CORBA today?
Are old CORBA based systems being maintained or transitioned?
Are new CORBA based systems being built? If so, in what contexts? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.116.92.84|69.116.92.84]] ([[User talk:69.116.92.84|talk]]) 18:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Corba is dead as a doornail. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/148.225.103.2|148.225.103.2]] ([[User talk:148.225.103.2|talk]]) 20:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Merging the Incarnation article ==
I'm merging the Incarnation article into this one. I'm not going to do much editing to make them fit together, I've done a little editing on the Incarnation text and I'm just going to add a new section called Incarnation after the Overview. It's not a great solution but my CORBA knowledge is kind of rusty and I would have to do more work than I have time for now to read up on it in order to really do justice to the article. But I think at least doing the merge is a step in the right direction: there were no refs on the Inception article at all and it's just a short block of text. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 18:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
:Thanks [[User:MadScientistX11]] ~[[user talk:Kvng|KvnG]] 14:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
== Merging [[Servant (CORBA)]] ==
I support merging.. I may do that if I bother.. I'm not an expert on CORBA, and do not really know "Servant" in CORBA or similar context, but it seem it belongs here and not needing a separate page.. It's been a year.. Either nobody cares to much about this/that article and/or it supports CORBA as "dead".. [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 16:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
:CORBA is not "dead". I was on a mailing list just yesterday where people were talking about it quite a lot in relation to a Semantic Web project. In any case even if CORBA were "dead" it was still extremely influential in the history of IT so the articles about it should be accurate. BTW, if you don't even know what a Servant is I don't see how you can responsibly edit that part of the article without first doing some serious study on the topic. I DO know what a Servant is but I don't feel I understand it well enough to edit further without doing more research first. --[[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11]] ([[User talk:MadScientistX11|talk]]) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
::You are right, I'm not sure what Servant is in the CORBA context (I said I would "support merging", I would be careful if I did it myself), but it would not disallow merging to this article? Shown by "(CORBA)" in the title.. (one other thing, people wouldn't know what that is, so it's kind of disallowed while "(software)" isn't).. I'm not saying CORBA isn't notable, it is and I remember it. This article is 30,094 bytes and there is room, and the other article is very short and it has hardly been edited since 2009 and not at all since the merge proposal a year ago.. Even if CORBA isn't dead, CORBA is notable, but [[Servant (CORBA)]] on it's own? I doubt it. [[User:Comp.arch|comp.arch]] ([[User talk:Comp.arch|talk]]) 21:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
{{done}} by {{u|Nbarth}} ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 14:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
== Relation to JSON & co ==
CORBA just seems like an over-engineered enterprisey (as defined by thedailywtf.com) and painful earlier alternative to easy-to-use things like JSON.<br/>
But I came here, to look for what CORBA brings to the table in comparison…<br/>
Aside from the article ringing all the alarm bells of enterprise-speak, I could not find a mention of how it relates to such protocols.<br/>
If anyone knows, adding this would be welcome. :)<br/>
— [[Special:Contributions/109.42.178.212|109.42.178.212]] ([[User talk:109.42.178.212|talk]]) 13:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
|