Talk:Descriptive notation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:47, 22 November 2021

Latest revision as of 18:28, 31 January 2024

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject Chessbanner shell|class=C|importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Chess|importance=Mid}}

}}

==needs improvement==

I think this article needs to be improved. --[[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] 03:32, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Line 91 ⟶ 92:

== Continued use in some symmetrical contexts ==

Annoyingly I cannot remember where I've seen this, but ifI mythink memoryI've servesstill well,seen DN is still sometimes used in especiallyspecially symmetrical contexts even when AN is used in the rest of the work. It's like the implicit use of DN in phrases like "rook on the seventh" (which in AN is the second rank if Black's doing it). One might then speak of the weakness at KB2 instead of that at f2/f7, or perhaps PxP listed in variations when it doesn't matter which pawn is doing the taking. Or perhaps in the ultimate sentence justifying the use of DN in such a scenario: "A fianchetto consists of the moves P-N3 and B-N2". Can anyone corroborate this hazy memory, though? [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp|talk]]) 18:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

:You often see things like this as English language descriptions rather than formal Descriptive Notation, like your "rook on the seventh" example, or generic references to "rook's pawn" or "knight's pawn". Sometimes it makes for more elegant English. [[User:MaxBrowne2|MaxBrowne2]] ([[User talk:MaxBrowne2|talk]]) 02:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)