Talk:Programming the Universe: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WPBooks|class=StubWikiProject Books|needs-infobox=|needs-infobox-cover=}}
}}
 
== Oh please ==
 
If you want to know about Quantum Computing, there are good accessible books out there, like Mermin's. And this "Big Idea" has been done to death, e.g. Wolfram, Deutsch, etc. - New Scientist has something along these lines every other week. (I'm writing this for the benefit of teenagers with an actual interest in science, who deserve to be directed to good stuff and not get stuck in dross like this.)[[Special:Contributions/137.205.183.114|137.205.183.114]] ([[User talk:137.205.183.114|talk]]) 07:20, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 
:: Wrong. Who are you to wrongly judge '''this excellent work'''? What have you discovered and written about? ''Programming the Universe'' is more about how Nature works than it is about quantum computers which are in their infancy. [[Stephan Wolfram]] agrees with Dr. [[Seth Lloyd]] who has been a professor of quantum computation at M.I.T. for many years. And what's your resume? I've discovered many 'Beyond Einstein Theories' combining quantum mechanics and general relativity including the ''Theory of Everything'': '''GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 on Planet Nestor'''. While I was sharing my theories at the 2006 ''37th Lunar and Planetary Conference'' in Houston, Lloyd's book 'coincidentally' appeared on the front table of the nearby Barnes and Noble Bookstore. '''There Are No Coincidences - there is synchronism...''' http://7seals.blogspot.com . [[Special:Contributions/2601:589:4802:AB0:252F:9340:C814:37D9|2601:589:4802:AB0:252F:9340:C814:37D9]] ([[User talk:2601:589:4802:AB0:252F:9340:C814:37D9|talk]]) 16:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 
== "Particles not only collide, they compute" ==