Talk:Dual-coding theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Breaugha1 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Cognitive science}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}.
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Psychologybanner shell|class=Stub|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Cognitive science|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Psychology|importance=}}
}}
 
==Untitled==
In the first paragraph of the article, the last sentence begins with:
 
Line 14 ⟶ 19:
--[[User:Craig.borchardt|Craig.borchardt]] 01:20 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-01-08">8 January 2020</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2020-04-25">25 April 2020</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/BYUIdaho/Cognitive_Psychology_(Winter)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Ccmcvey|Ccmcvey]].
 
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 19:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}}
===Dual-Route vs. Dual-Coding===
The article essentially claimed that dual-coding theory is synonymous with dual-route theory. I believe these are sufficiently distinct that the section on reading/literacy should not confuse the two. If anyone can clarify the distinction better than I am currently able to, it'd be welcome.
Line 26 ⟶ 35:
[[Special:Contributions/85.97.0.8|85.97.0.8]] ([[User talk:85.97.0.8|talk]]) 17:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 
==Project==
I am going to be editing this article for a project in my history class. I plan to organize the material better as well as make it more clear. Any comments or suggestions are welcome. [[User:Breaugha1|Breaugha1]] ([[User talk:Breaugha1|talk]]) 16:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
::Hi Breaugha1, and welcome! Please remember that Wikipedia is not an academic paper or essay. Wikipedia articles should not be based on [[WP:primary sources]], but on reliable, published [[secondary source]]s (for instance, journal reviews and professional or advanced academic textbooks) and, to a lesser extent, on [[tertiary source]]s (such as undergraduate textbooks). [[WP:MEDRS]] describes how to identify reliable sources for medical information, which is a good guideline for many psychology articles as well. With friendly regards, [[User:Lova_Falk|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#e75e03">'''Lova Falk'''</span></span>]] [[User talk:Lova Falk|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Segoe Print;color:#336699">talk</span></span>]] 11:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)