Talk:Extensible Authentication Protocol: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:29, 30 September 2017

Latest revision as of 15:26, 1 February 2024

(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{talkheader}}

{{WikiProject Computing |class=C|importance=low|network=yes|network-importance=mid|security=yes|security-importance=midLow}}

}}

{{merged from|EAP-SIM|date=2012-11-29}}

{{merged from|EAP-AKA|date=2012-11-29}}

{{Computing diagram requested|Security protocols are inherently difficult to understand. Diagrams are helpful.}}

==Untitled==

This page seems to have some serious anti-Cisco slant, possibly to the extent that it violates NPOV. In particular, phrases such as 'Swallowing the Cisco Kool-Aid' have no place in an encyclopdiac entry. Yes, it is true that LEAP as well as MD5 are vulernable to dictionary attacks; however, this article makes such the assinine references that EAP-FAST is likewise going to be insecure which is true speculation and also has no place in this entry. --anon

Line 52 ⟶ 49:

Some [[Extensible Authentication Protocol|EAP]] methods establish a secure tunnel between an authenticator and the home AAA server before the transmission of sensitive data, providing relief for most of those concerns. In these cases, there is sometimes an ''outer identity'' in clear text transmitted outside the EAP tunnel - visible to proxies so they can route packets - which doesn't have to reveal much about the user's true identity, and an ''inner identity'' that does, which is transmitted inside the secure EAP tunnel.<nowiki>{{Fact|date=April 2009}}</nowiki>

[[User:kgrr|<fontspan style="background: lightblue">&nbsp;kgrr</fontspan>]] [[User talk:kgrr|^<b>talk</b>]] 08:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

== "WPA Extended EAP" and "WPA2 Extended EAP" ==

Line 110 ⟶ 107:

Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 11:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

== Add EAP registry numbers ==

Most of communication and endpoint device’s configuration file are using EAP registry numbers defined by [[IANA]] [https://www.iana.org/assignments/eap-numbers/eap-numbers.xhtml here].--[[User:Imlibra925|imlibra925]] ([[User talk:Imlibra925|talk]]) 19:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

== Possible vandalism - external links and references purged ==

I just noticed that the external references are not links to anything and there are no references on the page. This appears to have been done in an edit [[Special:Permalink/826511883|on February 19, 2018]]. Should this be reverted? I would think it should be, but since it's been present for four months, perhaps there is a reason why nobody has reverted it yet? [[User:Shamino|Shamino]] ([[User talk:Shamino|talk]]) 17:38, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

== Is there a way to know if an equipement is implementing the EAP-PWD ? ==

thanks <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Walidou47|Walidou47]] ([[User talk:Walidou47#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Walidou47|contribs]]) 16:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->