Talk:Firefly algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Schwatzwutz - "Neutrality: new section"
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi | date = 15 July 2016 | result = '''keep''' | page = Firefly algorithm}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|
{{WikiProject Computer science}}
}}
{{connected contributor|Metafun}}
 
Line 13 ⟶ 16:
 
The article is biased. Comparisons to other Metaheuristics imply that the Firefly algorithm was a universal super-algorithm, which is [[No free lunch in search and optimization|not possible]]. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Schwatzwutz|Schwatzwutz]] ([[User talk:Schwatzwutz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Schwatzwutz|contribs]]) 11:38, 17 August 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
I do not think the article is biased, though some of the papers may indicate the algorithm can be superior
in their applications. So it's all up to the interpretation of the results. I have working in this area for many years, and I have rewrote that sentence to weaken the claims by that article. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ουδέτερος|Ουδέτερος]] ([[User talk:Ουδέτερος|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ουδέτερος|contribs]]) 11:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
 
== Deleted content ==
 
A large amount of content and references was removed with
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Firefly_algorithm&type=revision&diff=730193175&oldid=730106228 this series of edits]. [[User:Diego Moya|Diego]] ([[User talk:Diego Moya|talk]]) 20:21, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 
== Criticism ==
 
I have removed the boilerplate criticism section that appeared in the lede of this article (and in many others). I have replaced it with a section that covers only the criticism specific to this algorithm, and refers the reader to the more general criticism of nature-inspired metaheuristics at [[List of metaphor-based metaheuristics]]. Since I have made similar removals or replacements on other pages, if anyone has an issue with this one, it's best to start an omnibus discussion at [[Talk:List of metaphor-based metaheuristics]]. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 19:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)