Talk:Fixed-point theorems in infinite-dimensional spaces: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
reply to Janzon
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=low|}}
}}
Linas, you wrote:
 
Line 16 ⟶ 19:
 
:::: I will put the paragraph back again the way it is. But one day, when you run into the book, probably that is something to check. [[User:Oleg Alexandrov|Oleg Alexandrov]] 23:56, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 
 
 
 
 
== Ryll-Nardzewski subsumes Kakutani? ==
Line 25 ⟶ 24:
How or why does [[Ryll-Nardzewski_fixed_point_theorem|Ryll-Nardzewski]] subsume [[Kakutani_fixed_point_theorem|Kakutani]]? The former is about fixed points of maps, the latter about fixed points of correspondences. [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] 05:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 
::Actually, even in the case of maps, Ryll-Nardzewski does not, as is, subsume Kakutani; indeed, Kakutani is about all compact convex sets in a locally convex (Hausdorff) TVS, whilst Ryll-Nardzewski is only for the weakly compact in a normed space under isometries. The difference is huge (and accounts for the whole notion of amenable groups). I'll delete the wrong statement.[[Special:Contributions/128.178.14.162|128.178.14.162]] ([[User talk:128.178.14.162|talk]]) 07:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 
 
== The statement of Schauder's Fixed Point Theorem ==