Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 93.80.71.142 - "→Python is not C=based definetely: new section" |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=NA}}
}}
==Multiple inheritance==
Why is C# listed as a derivative of C, but Java is not? The whole premise of this list, i.e. that languages form a simple tree is a bit suspect. [[User:2988|0xBAC]] 06:56, 1 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Line 63 ⟶ 64:
Python is based on Modula-2/Oberon models, not C.
It should be placed in Pascal family near Lua. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/93.80.71.142|93.80.71.142]] ([[User talk:93.80.71.142|talk]]) 22:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
python is based on many languages but the syntax is from ABC~fred <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/96.250.190.3|96.250.190.3]] ([[User talk:96.250.190.3|talk]]) 02:07, 5 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
: Should [[SETL]] (correctly listed as parent of [[ABC (programming language)|ABC]] and grandparent of [[Python (programming language)|Python]]) really be a root? I have always assumed it was strongly influenced by [[ALGOL]]. However I cannot find any mention of this by Jack Schwartz or anyone else involved in the design of the language. --[[User:Finnw|Finnw]] ([[User talk:Finnw|talk]]) 20:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
== D is more based on C++ than C ==
It was designed as a replacement for C++ and includes almost all features presented in C++. [[User:Vladislav.kuzkokov|Vladislav.kuzkokov]] ([[User talk:Vladislav.kuzkokov|talk]]) 08:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
== Redlinked languages and [[WP:WTAF]]? ==
Should this list be subject to [[WP:WTAF]]? There are a number of redlinks, and more get added over time, although some are removed as well. On [[List of programming languages]], for example, the no redlink policy is fairly strictly enforced. I think the policy should apply here, but as it clearly has not been really enforced in some time (if ever), I thought I'd open a discussion before removing them. I've recently removed the redlinks from [[List of programming languages by type]], without objection (and some encouragement from another editor), although the problem was more severe there. [[User:Rwessel|Rwessel]] ([[User talk:Rwessel|talk]]) 07:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Support.''' Go for it. [[WP:BEBOLD]]. [[User:Msnicki|Msnicki]] ([[User talk:Msnicki|talk]]) 08:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Done. A summary:
:A variety of redlinks and other items without articles were removed per [[WP:WTAF]].
:'''Today based''' section removed – no primary article, only a stub for the single derived language.
:'''Neat3''' removed – link only
:'''RPG''': link removed, in article
: '''<nowiki>{{reflist}}</nowiki>''' removed (no more references)
[[User:Rwessel|Rwessel]] ([[User talk:Rwessel|talk]]) 20:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
| |||