Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Apphacker - "" |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Java}}. Tag: |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{afd-merged-from|GNU Interpreter for Java|GNU Interpreter for Java|21 April 2018}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=}}▼
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
{{WikiProject Java|importance=High}}
}}
==When did it start?==
Anyone know when GCJ began development?
Line 17 ⟶ 22:
== Criticisms ==
Someone in the know should write a section about how much GCJ sucks. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Apphacker|Apphacker]] ([[User talk:Apphacker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Apphacker|contribs]]) 19:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Truly, this is so. It's hard to overstate just how disruptive (and not in a good way) the presence of gcj on default Linux installs has been. Far better to have no java to start with and install a working one than have a broken one preinstalled that one must scrape (like so many runny dog turds) off the system. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/64.142.107.94|64.142.107.94]] ([[User talk:64.142.107.94|talk]]) 20:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Quote? ==
What is with the quote about CNI? It reads like a testimonial, but isn't attributed. The reader wonders who is this "We" that uses CNI? Also, the introduction to CNI seems a bit abrupt. Maybe it could be smoothed out. [[User:SlowJog|SlowJog]] ([[User talk:SlowJog|talk]]) 14:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
== Project in maintenance mode? ==
The article says that this project is in maintenance mode, however the reference does not seem to indicate that, so far as i can tell. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/41.246.249.209|41.246.249.209]] ([[User talk:41.246.249.209|talk]]) 16:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I think the article is some kind of vague or incomplete, because the page refered to have fewer updates lately. [http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/changes.html This] GCC 4.3 Release Series description page instead tells us: gcj uses Eclipse Java compiler for parsing, making gcj accept [[Java_version_history#J2SE_5.0_.28September_30.2C_2004.29|Java 1.5]] (AKA 5.0) constructions. Maybe the page refd to, reflects that the parsing was suddenly much more mature without the gcj maintainers wiggling their fingers too much. [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: yellow"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 20:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
::Ah, I found a reference indicating that this "maintenance mode" stuff is an unfounded extrapolation, namely [http://gcc.gnu.org/java/status.html GCJ Status] which was last modified Nov 2 2012. I think that the GCJ guys are not just announcement oriented. I'll surf around a little to see what last update really was. [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: #FFFF80"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 16:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
:::Quite wrong. Last gcc series that had Java changes was 4.3. Thereafter nothing. I think maybe gcj lacks maintainers. [[User:Rursus|Rursus]] dixit. ([[User talk:Rursus|<span style="color: red; background: #FFFF80"><sup>m</sup><u>bork<sup>3</sup></u></span>]]!) 16:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on [[GNU Compiler for Java]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=804526589 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070509055923/http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ to https://gcc.gnu.org/java/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 16:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
| |||