Talk:Event-driven architecture: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Pmerson (talk | contribs)
Question: how to implement EDA?
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}.
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing }}
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Sigma 7|date=8 March 2007}}
}}
== EDA concept: got it! Now, how do I implement it? ==
I understand the terminology and the concepts. But what products, frameworks, libraries exist to implement EDA? If I use JMS and message-driven beans subscribing to specific topics, is it EDA?
* Answer: Using a messaging broker with a JMS topic per event type is a common implementation strategy for an event bus. However, point-to-point connection between emitters and consumers can lead to more scalable and flexible architectures. The point-to-point implementations are more complex and often require an eventing framework.
 
== EDA vs EDP ==
Line 62 ⟶ 67:
== Relationship to Event-Driven Programming ==
 
There are certainly differences in scope (single process versus multiple physical nodes across the enterprise), but there are many shared concepts between the two. The syntax and mechanisms differ, but there are events in many languages, such as C#, that you can subscribe to. EDA takes that earlier model and expands upon it, and it would be useful to see that explained, which would also give a good introduction to the subject. {{<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:64.91.76.251|64.91.76.251}}]] ([[User talk:64.91.76.251|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/64.91.76.251|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
 
==Copyedit==
== Event processing styles section is not clear ==
{{WP:LoCE |March 2007 |[[User:Sigma 7|Sigma 7]] 19:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 
|[[User:Galena11|Galena11]] 20:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC) }}
"Event processing styles" section needs to be more elaborative. I wanted to know about EDA and it is confusing to know the different between Simple Event Processing and Event Stream Processing. The explanation given says that both of them are meant for real-time flow but not depicting the difference. And, please explain what is a "complex event" before explain Complex Event Processing style. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Cuddaloredavinci|Cuddaloredavinci]] ([[User talk:Cuddaloredavinci#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cuddaloredavinci|contribs]]) 09:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->