Talk:Open Source Routing Machine: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:45, 28 May 2012

Latest revision as of 13:16, 5 February 2024

(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WP Computing}}

{{Old AfD multi|page=Open Source Routing Machine|date=15 May 2012|result='''speedy keep/withdrawn'''}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|

{{WPWikiProject Computing}}

}}

==Text==

Line 8 ⟶ 10:

==STOP TRYING TO DELETE THIS PAGE==

I literally just started working on it, guys. Jesus christ. It's been 10 minutes. I'm clearly actively working on it. You fucking busybodies have ruined wikipedia. This isn't fun anymore. [[User:Miserlou|Miserlou]] ([[User talk:Miserlou|talk]]) 19:54, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

:Sorry to disappoint you, but all articles must at all times meet our inclusion criteria as described at [[WP:N]]. If you want to work on a draft without fear of immediate deletion, you can create it in your user space, e.g. in [[User:Miserlou/Open Source Routing Machine]]. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<fontspan style="color:white;background:blue;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Sandstein&nbsp;'''</fontspan>]]</span></small> 20:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

==Copyright question==

Line 16 ⟶ 18:

If it ''is'' compatibly licensed, it needs to be properly attributed in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism]]. Verbatim copying from public ___domain or compatibly licensed sourced must be explicitly acknowledged. --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] ^{[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]} 14:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I am the author of the text on the OSRM website. Wikipedia has the permission to reproduce the text from the site. A corresponding notice will be posted on the website shortly.[[User:DennisOSRM|DennisOSRM]] ([[User talk:DennisOSRM|talk]]) 07:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

:Fabulous. :) Please be sure that the statement releases it under a compatible license; we aren't allowed to accept material that is released for Wikipedia because of our own liberal license, which permits republication by others. Where possible, we ''do'' like to have dual release under CC-By-SA and GFDL to allow maximum flexibility for our reusers, but only CC-By-SA is required. This is the recommended statement:

:::The text of this website [or page, if you are specifically releasing one section] is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

:Thanks much! --[[User:Moonriddengirl|Moonriddengirl]] ^{[[User talk:Moonriddengirl|(talk)]]} 10:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

::Done. The above clause is online. [[User:DennisOSRM|DennisOSRM]] ([[User talk:DennisOSRM|talk]]) 11:36, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

:: I know this is a few years old, but it should be noted that if the author of the text says "just fucking use it", that's as good as your blurb if not better. Your version does not add anything, other than more words. I agree with [[User:Miserlou]] about busybodies.

== Category ==

the category "routing software" is for network routing not for navigation routing. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.47.115.125|78.47.115.125]] ([[User talk:78.47.115.125|talk]]) 09:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->