Talk:Latin script in Unicode: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Typography}}, {{WikiProject Writing systems}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computingbanner shell|class=listList|importance1=low}}
{{WikiProject Typography|class=listComputing|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Writing systems|class=listTypography|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Writing systems|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia}}
}}
 
==Colours?==
Line 32 ⟶ 35:
:: <s>{{ping|BabelStone}} Maybe it should be integrated into [[List of Latin letters]] as a separate section? [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer1234qwer4]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|talk]]) 21:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)</s>
:: Actually, the table listed explicitly Latin letters in Unicode by shape; as you can see from the number of letters in the mentioned [[List of Latin letters]], it would be very different if it was listing “all” Latin letters. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure if such a list is needed. We already have a list of Latin letters by shap,e regardless if they are in Unicode or not, and a list of Unicode letters by codepoint. What do you think? [[User:1234qwer1234qwer4|1234qwer1234qwer4]] ([[User talk:1234qwer1234qwer4|talk]]) 21:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
:::In my opinion the list of letters by shape is not really suitable for Wikipedia, and I would have deleted them if not added by a very experienced editor. [[User:BabelStone|BabelStone]] ([[User talk:BabelStone|talk]]) 21:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 
== Please put [[G with tilde]] character URGENTLY in Unicode! ==
 
Please put [[G with tilde]] character URGENTLY in Unicode! It is of great importance for obvious reasons! --[[User:Jaques O. Carvalho|Jaques O. Carvalho]] [[User talk:Jaques O. Carvalho|&#9756;]] 14:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
:You can [http://www.unicode.org/pending/proposals.html?utm_source=webtekno submit a character proposal] to Unicode but it's unlikely to be accepted because [[G with tilde]] is already supported, just not as a [[precomposed character]]. The Unicode page on proposals notes {{quote|The Unicode Consortium is interested in obtaining information on known glyphs, minor variants, precomposed characters (including ligatures, conjunct consonants, and accented characters) and other such "non-characters," mainly for cataloging and research purposes; however, they are generally not acceptable for character proposals.}} Search for "precomposed" at Unicode's "[https://www.unicode.org/alloc/nonapprovals.html Archive of Notices of Non-Approval] for various declined proposals "rejected by the UTC as a precomposed letter already represented by the sequence ...". I have no doubt a request for a precomposed G WITH TILDE will meet the same fate. [[User:Drmccreedy|DRMcCreedy]] ([[User talk:Drmccreedy|talk]]) 15:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)