Content deleted Content added
→Links not working anymore...: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Java}}. Tag: |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Java|importance=low}}
}}
==Untitled==
Can you add some details about the difference between java.io.* and java.nio.* [[User:Jgold03|Jgold03]] 01:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 44 ⟶ 45:
Since dump-shit Oracle wiped the 1.4 API (they didn't really get that the Java API is supposed to never change!), you need to replace some links with new ones. --[[Special:Contributions/178.197.228.138|178.197.228.138]] ([[User talk:178.197.228.138|talk]]) 18:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
== Doesn't "NIO" Stand for "non-blocking I/O" ? ==
According from this link from documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/io/enhancements.html#7
File I/O (featuring NIO 2.0) in the Java Tutorials; NIO stands for non-blocking I/O <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.219.115.2|91.219.115.2]] ([[User talk:91.219.115.2|talk]]) 05:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I have always thought that NIO stood for "Non-blocking I/O", as some of the Oracle documentation says. But reviewing Java 5 documentation, they say "The Java NIO (New Input/Output)" (https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/15/core/java-nio.html). Maybe NIO version 1 is more "new" and version 2 more "non-blocking"? [[User:Chiro79|Chiro79]] ([[User talk:Chiro79|talk]]) 11:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
== "NIO" is "New", not "Non-Blocking" ==
According to the 1.5 release notes<ref>https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/nio/</ref>, NIO stands for "New IO": ''"The new I/O (NIO) APIs introduced in v 1.4..."''
Suggesting that it stands for non-blocking IO is misleading to new Java developers, in that it suggests these are special IO APIs for special circumstances. In fact they're just "new", and since they're in many ways more convenient, identifying them as "new" will lead developers to more readily explore them. The "non-blocking" terminology should be removed.
[[User:Vancinad|Vancinad]] ([[User talk:Vancinad|talk]]) 23:37, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
| |||