Content deleted Content added
Tag: |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Old AfD multi |date=11 May 2010 |result='''Delete''' |page=Nimrod (programming language) |date2=23 August 2013 |result2='''Delete''' |page2=Nimrod (programming language) (2nd nomination) |page3=Nim (programming language) |date3=26 March 2015 |result3='''no consensus''' |date4=5 July 2019 |result4='''Speedy keep''' |page4=Nim (programming language) (4th nomination) |date5=25 February 2021 |result5='''Keep''' |page5=Nim (programming language) (5th nomination)}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=low |science=yes |software=yes |science-importance=Low |software-importance=Low}} }}
== Contested deletion ==
Line 60 ⟶ 62:
:It is now April 2021, and even though the two latest delete-nominations ended with keep, the article itself still doesn't convey notability. With only a handful of exceptions, the more than 50 inline references are either primary sources or GitHub repos. The only exception, other than two YouTube videos and events where Nim was talked about, is an ''InfoWorld'' article! The only reason I think it may have some notability is that apparently it has enough fanpeeps to get this huge article, that's full of excessive details, into Wikipedia... --[[Special:Contributions/143.176.30.65|143.176.30.65]] ([[User talk:143.176.30.65|talk]]) 13:08, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
:And if you look at the latest delete-nomination discussion, the only additional refs that people could find are either websites discussing Nim reaching version 1.0, or non-reliable sources. --[[Special:Contributions/143.176.30.65|143.176.30.65]] ([[User talk:143.176.30.65|talk]]) 13:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
:I agree, it fails to meet [[WP:GNG]]; Mostly. <span style="font-weight: bold" >[[User:Alexander_Davronov|<span style="color:#a8a8a8;">AXO</span><span style="color:#000">NOV</span>]] [[User talk:Alexander_Davronov|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Alexander_Davronov|⚑]]</span> 06:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* [[commons:File:The modern logo for the Nim programming language.svg|The modern logo for the Nim programming language.svg]]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2023-05-06T02:22:53.840504 | The modern logo for the Nim programming language.svg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the [[commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:The modern logo for the Nim programming language.svg|nomination page]]. —[[User:Community Tech bot|Community Tech bot]] ([[User talk:Community Tech bot|talk]]) 02:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
== Is this article "too technical?" ==
{{reply to|Humphrey Tribble}} Which concepts in this article are [[Special:Diff/1194058269|"too technical"]] for readers to understand? [[User:Jarble|Jarble]] ([[User talk:Jarble|talk]]) 18:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
:Firstly, {{user|Jarble}}, I apologise for leaving a a flippant comment instead of a more helpful explanation at the outset.
:The template's purpose is to flag "excessive jargon, without enough explanation of concepts and too difficult for readers to understand without a background in the field." So it can suggest an article could be improved or simply alert readers that it will be heavy going.
:[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Technical language]] governs. MOS recommends that the introduction, especially, should be understandable by educated people without having to follow links. But the introduction of [[Nim (programming language)]] has 21 links in only two sentences. That second sentence is also very long. It sounds rather like a manufacturer's description.
: [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal]] adds to MOS. The inclusion of numerous programming examples in Nim is certainly like a manual or textbook.
:Nevertheless, [[Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable]] has practical suggestions for dealing with complex subjects.
:Let me know if I haven't explained it adequately. [[User:Humphrey Tribble|Humpster]] ([[User talk:Humphrey Tribble|talk]]) 22:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
| |||