Talk:Two-phase commit protocol: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:03, 15 August 2012

Latest revision as of 06:32, 7 February 2024

(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject Computerbanner scienceshell|class=C|importance=High}}

{{WPDATABASE|class=CWikiProject Computer science|importance=High}}

{{WikiProject Databases|importance=High}}

}}

{{tmbox

| type = notice

Line 13 ⟶ 15:

}}

}}

{{computing diagram requested|an image to replace the ASCII diagram in "Message flow" section}}

== Wikipedia text on Tree and Dynamic 2PC (D2PC) copied "as is" to a COIT 2008 conference paper ==

Line 102 ⟶ 104:

The neutrality of part of this page is disputed, as part of a wider discussion. See [[Talk:Commitment ordering]] and [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science#User:Comps / Commitment ordering]]. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 14:36, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

::I find this entire discussion improper. The "disputed neutrality" is not explained. What facts in the article(s) are disputed? The "discussion" has never been carried out in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science#User:Comps / Commitment ordering]], except request for attention for a long list of related "suspected" articles that at least some of them (if not all) have been similarly tagged. The "discussion" went in March 2012 to archive with ''nothing'' factual said or concluded. The tag should be removed. I also see that it recently ignited another similar baseless "discussion" named "The Raz infection is spreading" in [[Talk:Commitment ordering]]. I cannot avoid thinking about "The Jews infection" in Nazi slur. [[Special:Contributions/65.96.201.116|65.96.201.116]] ([[User talk:65.96.201.116|talk]]) 14:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

:::The archived main discussion: [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_science/Archive_10#User:Comps_.2F_Commitment_ordering]]

:::[[Special:Contributions/65.96.201.116|65.96.201.116]] ([[User talk:65.96.201.116|talk]]) 15:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)