Talk:Panjer recursion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m {{WPStatistics}}
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WPStatistics}}.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WPStatistics}}
{{WikiProject Statistics|importance=low}}
}}
==Merger proposal==
Copied from [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics#Another article to consider]]:
Line 30 ⟶ 32:
:There should be a distinct separation between the (a,b,0) class and Panjer's recursion. Note that the recursion provides a way to compute the distribution function of compound distributions when the count (claim number, frequency, etc.) belongs to the (a,b,0) class. However, the compound distribution itself does NOT belong to the (a,b,0) class. If anything, the Panjer Recursion page should be expanded to include the continuous form and some discussion on the stability of the algorithm. This page would make more sense as a discussion on the more general (a,b,m) class, with (a,b,0) linking to it. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/149.173.6.51|149.173.6.51]] ([[User talk:149.173.6.51|talk]]) 14:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
'''Closure''': given the above, I have moved most of the material on the [[(a,b,0) class of distributions]] to that article from [[Panjer recusionrecursion]], hopefully leaving just enough to make [[Panjer recusionrecursion]] understandable. [[User:Melcombe|Melcombe]] ([[User talk:Melcombe|talk]]) 11:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)