Talk:Alice (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
adding link to old AfD discussion
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Computer science}}.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|{{WikiProject Computingbanner shell|class=startStart|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=startComputing|importance=}}}}
{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=}}
{{Old AfD
}}
{{Old AfD multi
| date = 26 November 2010
| result = '''delete'''
| link = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alice_%28programming_language%29
| date2 = February 14, 2011
| result2 = '''overturn and restore'''
| link2 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_February_14#Alice_(programming_language)
| caption2 = DRV
}}
 
==Requested move==
[[Alice programming language]] → [[Alice (programming language)]]
Line 26 ⟶ 34:
*'''Overturn and undelete''': Plenty of readily available high quality citations on google scholar [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22alice+ml%22+programming] [[User:Imprecisekludge|Imprecisekludge]] ([[User talk:Imprecisekludge|talk]]) 16:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 
*'''Endorse, allowing recreation''' - No matter how much I personally disliked the deletion spree, the DRV rationale borders on nonsense and the consensus was very clear. Given that it seems (from the AfD) that there is more than one Alice programming language and there is evidence of notability of at least one of the two, I'd say no problem if someone rewrites an article with the same title with evidence of notability. --[[User:Cyclopia|<fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">Cycl</fontspan><big>o</big><fontspan colorstyle="color:green;">pia</fontspan>]][[User talk:Cyclopia|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;"><sup>talk</sup></fontspan>]] 18:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
**The other language/environment already has an article at [[Alice (software)]]. --[[User:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan]] ([[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|talk]]) 18:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
**I'm at a loss as to how all votes to keep outside of the nominator counts as a clear consensus (as noted by Calathan). -- [[User:Imprecisekludge|Imprecisekludge]] ([[User talk:Imprecisekludge|talk]]) 21:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Line 51 ⟶ 59:
*'''Overturn to no consensus / keep''' While the votes could have been better phrased, there was no consensus for deletion and reliable and verifiable sources that were directly relevant to the article were provided and referenced, and these sources don't need to be peer reviewed to be acceptable. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn|talk]]) 01:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
*'''Overturn''' and troutslap the closing admin for blatantly ignoring the consensus of the discussion, also ignoring the valid sources that were presented in some of the comments, giving a misleading close rationale that gives the false impression that no valid sources were presented, and allowing the personal attacks that were also present in some of the comments to sway his judgement. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 02:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
* '''Overturn''' and undelete. Clearly overwhelming consensus to keep. [[User:Steven Walling|<fontspan style="font-family: Georgia;">[[User:Steven Walling|Steven Walling]]</fontspan>]] 03:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 
== Link to Website seems incorrect ==
 
The "Website" field in the info box says "www.alice.org" on both pages "Alice (software)" and "Alice (programming language)". The site seems to be for the software described in "Alice (software)", so I think the site listed on this page's info box is incorrect. [[Special:Contributions/47.186.122.163|47.186.122.163]] ([[User talk:47.186.122.163|talk]]) 01:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)