Talk:Procedural memory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 07:14, 17 January 2022

Latest revision as of 11:52, 8 February 2024

(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

Ḙ{{Talk header}}

{{WikiProject Psychologybanner shell|class=C |importance=Mid}}

{{WikiProject Neuroscience|class=CPsychology|importance=LowMid}}

{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=Low}}

}}

{{to do}}

{{Educational assignment}}

Line 74 ⟶ 76:

= Merge from Automaticity? =

'''Merge''' Seems like a no-brainer. <b>[[User:Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#333333;">Sparkie82</fontspan>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#666666;">t</fontspan>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#666666;">c</fontspan>]])</b> 16:53, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Does not automaticity involve unconscious thinking, that is processing of new information? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.246.19.211|46.246.19.211]] ([[User talk:46.246.19.211|talk]]) 21:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Line 91 ⟶ 93:

:''Skill acquisition is achieved when an observed behaviour has changed due to experience or practice. This is known as learning and is not directly observable.''

Because the vandalism is so difficult to detect, I think a revert to some earlier version might significantly improve the article without having to plod through it as it is. <b>[[User:Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#333333;">Sparkie82</fontspan>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#666666;">t</fontspan>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Sparkie82|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#666666;">c</fontspan>]])</b> 16:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I can speak to this. The update was part of a University project to update stub-level wikipedia pages in the field of Memory. Students were encouraged to use the existing page if there was useful information, though I believe many of them did not. There was also much confusion on image rights and having a shared account, which lead to several warnings which were (hopefully) all cleared up. So while there is no doubt this article could be improved, it was not an act of vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/68.67.58.114|68.67.58.114]] ([[User talk:68.67.58.114|talk]]) 16:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Line 129 ⟶ 131:

"McDougall" is referenced but not cited. Presumably it is [[William McDougall (psychologist)]], but this is not linked. [[Special:Contributions/2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11|2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11]] ([[User talk:2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11|talk]]) 16:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

== Learning Musical Instruments ==

Not an important topic? [[User:FangoFuficius|FangoFuficius]] ([[User talk:FangoFuficius|talk]]) 06:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)