Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Psychology}}, {{WikiProject Neuroscience}}. Tag: |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
Ḙ{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Neuroscience|importance=Low}}
}}
{{to do}}
{{Educational assignment}}
=Untitled=
==Untitled==
it seems as if there is quite some congruence between this wikipedia-article and the text in this link
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/P/Pr/Procedural_memory.htm
Line 72 ⟶ 76:
= Merge from Automaticity? =
'''Merge''' Seems like a no-brainer. <b>[[User:Sparkie82|<
Does not automaticity involve unconscious thinking, that is processing of new information? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.246.19.211|46.246.19.211]] ([[User talk:46.246.19.211|talk]]) 21:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Line 89 ⟶ 93:
:''Skill acquisition is achieved when an observed behaviour has changed due to experience or practice. This is known as learning and is not directly observable.''
Because the vandalism is so difficult to detect, I think a revert to some earlier version might significantly improve the article without having to plod through it as it is. <b>[[User:Sparkie82|<
I can speak to this. The update was part of a University project to update stub-level wikipedia pages in the field of Memory. Students were encouraged to use the existing page if there was useful information, though I believe many of them did not. There was also much confusion on image rights and having a shared account, which lead to several warnings which were (hopefully) all cleared up. So while there is no doubt this article could be improved, it was not an act of vandalism. [[Special:Contributions/68.67.58.114|68.67.58.114]] ([[User talk:68.67.58.114|talk]]) 16:34, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Webster_University/Applied_Learning_Sciences_(Spring_Quarter_1)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Kat0529|Kat0529]].
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 07:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
==File:Margot Fonteyn.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
{|
Line 109 ⟶ 117:
As a first year psychology student, procedural memory in and of itself was a concept I needed to research due to the fallibility of my instructor. He required knowledge of procedural memory for our final, but did not cover it in class & it was not in our textbook. If the articles had been merged I would not have found what I needed. Please keep them separate for future generations to find. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.0.45.201|67.0.45.201]] ([[User talk:67.0.45.201|talk]]) 00:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Do not merge the two! ==
Automaticity should be updated, not merged with "Procedural memory", as the element of it being directly related to procedural memory is "Post-conscious automaticity", but there is another side to automaticity that has emerged in psychology, i.e. Pre-conscious automaticity, which is not preceded by conscious/intentional thought. (Bargh, Schwader, Hailey, Dyer, & Boothby, 2012). Thus, merging the two would just necessarily give birth to a second article and it would just add to the confusion, having to differentiate the two concepts of pre- and postconscious automaticity while they're defined in two different articles.
Bargh, J. A., Schwader, K. L., Hailey, S. E., Dyer, R. L., & Boothby, E. J. (2012). Automaticity in social-cognitive processes. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(12), 593-605. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.203.30.24|90.203.30.24]] ([[User talk:90.203.30.24|talk]]) 11:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
= Dubious =
Some ridiculous comments about how "we have all seen" professional athletes "perform like beginners" or similar nonsense that looks like it was lifted from a magazine article, I flagged it. [[User:Anonywiki|Anonywiki]] ([[User talk:Anonywiki|talk]]) 21:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
== "McDougall" ==
"McDougall" is referenced but not cited. Presumably it is [[William McDougall (psychologist)]], but this is not linked. [[Special:Contributions/2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11|2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11]] ([[User talk:2606:A000:1126:28D:49B1:F7CF:DED4:6F11|talk]]) 16:55, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
== Learning Musical Instruments ==
Not an important topic? [[User:FangoFuficius|FangoFuficius]] ([[User talk:FangoFuficius|talk]]) 06:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
| |||