Talk:Process capability index: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 13:13, 19 July 2007 edit Sn14534 (talk \| contribs) 32 edits ... and how are these interpreted? ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:53, 8 February 2024 edit undo Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 8,374,869 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Business}}, {{WikiProject Statistics}}. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(28 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\| There is no point in listing an equation if you are not going to define what the variables mean. Namely, what on earth is do USL and LSL stand for? Even sigma should be defined for those who do not know what they are looking at. {{WikiProject Business\|importance=Low}} ~~:Fixed. --mabahj 11:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)~~ {{WikiProject Statistics\|importance=Low}} }} {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Process capability index/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}} --- ~~USP - Upper Specification Limit~~ ~~LSL - Lower specification Limit~~ ~~These are related to statistical process control (SPC).~~ ~~-- Manaf 28 June 2007 (EST)~~ ~~== ... and how are these interpreted? ==~~ It would be ''really'' helpful, I think, if someone could add a sentence or two for each measure to say what a "good" value is ... e.g., 1.0 is good, higher is better, things like that. [[User:Sn14534\|Sn14534]] 13:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Sn14534