Talk:Process capability index: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 16:24, 5 September 2007 edit DanielPenfield (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 38,646 edits response ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:53, 8 February 2024 edit undo Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 8,374,869 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Business}}, {{WikiProject Statistics}}. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(24 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\| There is no point in listing an equation if you are not going to define what the variables mean. Namely, what on earth is do USL and LSL stand for? Even sigma should be defined for those who do not know what they are looking at. {{WikiProject Business\|importance=Low}} ~~:Fixed. --mabahj 11:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)~~ {{WikiProject Statistics\|importance=Low}} }} {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis\|archiveprefix=Talk:Process capability index/Archives/\|format=Y\|age=26297\|index=yes\|archivebox=yes\|box-advert=yes}} --- ~~USP - Upper Specification Limit~~ ~~LSL - Lower specification Limit~~ ~~These are related to statistical process control (SPC).~~ ~~-- Manaf 28 June 2007 (EST)~~ ~~== ... and how are these interpreted? ==~~ It would be ''really'' helpful, I think, if someone could add a sentence or two for each measure to say what a "good" value is ... e.g., 1.0 is good, higher is better, things like that. [[User:Sn14534\|Sn14534]] 13:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC) ~~== C<SUB>pk</SUB> ==~~ I have noticed that the Ckp value equation has an mistake; there shoud be T instead of µ (targed instead of estimated/calculated mean). If µ is used, the result is PPk. Could someone make the correction, please. Antti 29th Aug 2007 <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.130.237.254\|192.130.237.254]] ([[User talk:192.130.237.254\|talk]]) 06:57, August 29, 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> :*C<SUB>pk</SUB> does not take the target, T, into account according to NIST (http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section1/pmc16.htm) or Montgomery (http://he-cda.wiley.com/WileyCDA/HigherEdTitle/productCd-0471656313.html). Perhaps you're thinking of a variant on C<SUB>pk</SUB> that does? — [[User:DanielPenfield\|DanielPenfield]] 16:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)