Content deleted Content added
→Trashcan: Reply |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |amiga=Yes |amiga-importance=Mid |software=Yes |software-importance=Low}} }}
I'm not sure but I think the first line may be POV. [[User:-Ozone-|Ozone]] 19:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Line 26 ⟶ 28:
::Amiga magazines rarely go into the technical detail required. [[Special:Contributions/146.191.95.1|146.191.95.1]] ([[User talk:146.191.95.1|talk]]) 13:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
::I would question if old Amiga magazines out of print would fall within wikipedia's notability guidelines. Generally one might expect to be able to read and confirm references. [[Special:Contributions/90.192.220.55|90.192.220.55]] ([[User talk:90.192.220.55|talk]]) 21:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
:::Offline sources are perfectly useable (note many Amiga magazines/scans are available online). I participated in dozens AfDs and nobody ever disputed good old computer magazines as sources proving notability (see [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:N]] for more general info). [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||