Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Computing: class=Start (assisted) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Low |amiga=Yes |amiga-importance=Mid |software=Yes |software-importance=Low}}
}}
I'm not sure but I think the first line may be POV. [[User:-Ozone-|Ozone]] 19:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Line 18 ⟶ 19:
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 14:38, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
== Trashcan ==
I'd just like to point out that there's absolutely no doubt that PFS was the first Amiga filesystem to introduce a filesystem-level "trashcan", as it was a) an Amiga filesystem with a filesystem-level trashcan and (b) was the second Amiga filesystem (if you consider OFS/FFS to be a single one) and OFS/FFS did not have one. I think there were a grand total of four native filesystems on original Amiga so it's not exactly a stretch to claim.
An example of how Wikipedia is completely unsuitable for publishing anything Amiga-related, due to the paucity of modern third-party references. Citation is needed but can never be supplied. [[Special:Contributions/2.217.212.107|2.217.212.107]] ([[User talk:2.217.212.107|talk]]) 14:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
:Amiga magazines of the 80s/90s are suitable as reliable sources... so check your library and provide needed sources. [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
::Amiga magazines rarely go into the technical detail required. [[Special:Contributions/146.191.95.1|146.191.95.1]] ([[User talk:146.191.95.1|talk]]) 13:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
::I would question if old Amiga magazines out of print would fall within wikipedia's notability guidelines. Generally one might expect to be able to read and confirm references. [[Special:Contributions/90.192.220.55|90.192.220.55]] ([[User talk:90.192.220.55|talk]]) 21:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
:::Offline sources are perfectly useable (note many Amiga magazines/scans are available online). I participated in dozens AfDs and nobody ever disputed good old computer magazines as sources proving notability (see [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:N]] for more general info). [[User:Pavlor|Pavlor]] ([[User talk:Pavlor|talk]]) 05:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
| |||