The [[:Category:Machine learning]] is a bit overfull. Anyone here up for organizing the relevant terms from ''computational learning theory'' in an appropriate subcategory? Thank you. --[[User:Chire|Chire]] ([[User talk:Chire|talk]]) 16:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
== Cleaning Up References ==
== Evolvability problems of neurological applications. ==
While there is a references section at the end, citations to those references need to be worked into the body of the text. I suspect the existing references are sufficient for all current uncited claims. [[User:Stellaathena|Stellaathena]] ([[User talk:Stellaathena|talk]]) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Specific mechanisms theory predicts that at least three specific modules are necessary to get anything done at all: one for perceptual cognition, one for emotional motivation and one executive. None of them is of any use unless the other two are already there. This raises a severe evolvability paradox for psychological nativism/evolutionary psychology/computational theory of mind. There are also specific evolvability paradoxes, such as redundant phonemes (no reason why a vast range of innate phonetic potential should have evolved when far fewer phonemes are evidently enough for a complex language, as shown by Polynesian languages), the first moral evolvability paradox (that a single moral individual would not survive in a group where everyone else was amoral) and first individual evolvability paradoxes in regards to many sexual behaviors (especially species recognition and sexual characteristic recognition). Then there is evidence, especially from domestication research, that evolution can go very fast. This means that nativist theory predicts that different human groups should have evolved big racial differences in psychology by natural selection working on individual hereditary psychiatry. That prediction is falsified by studies showing that supposed racial differences disappear when social factors are taken into account. These evolvability paradoxes are described in greater detail on the pages "Brain" and "Self-organization" on Pure science Wiki, a wiki for the scientific method uncorrupted by academic pursuit of prestige.
[[Special:Contributions/109.58.44.105|109.58.44.105]] ([[User talk:109.58.44.105|talk]]) 15:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Martin J Sallberg
