Talk:Computational learning theory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:29, 30 January 2004

Latest revision as of 04:46, 9 February 2024

(16 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

{{WikiProject Robotics|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Statistics|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Computer science|importance=Low}}

}}

==Untitled==

This article looks like it overlaps [[learning theory (statistics)]] and should be combined in some way. -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 05:29, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Computational learning theory is more properly a sub-discipline of computational complexity theory. Although a number of results in learning theory use results from statistics, the contribution of (modern) learning theory (and learning theorists) to statistics is not all that significant. --[[User:krishnanp|krishnanp]] 15:23, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Bayesian statistics is not a subdiscipline of computational learning theory. It's a rigorous approach to statistics coupled with a different philosophy about probability. It would make no sense that the Bayesian approach to stats was a subdiscipline of CLT but the classical frequentist stats was not. Unless you're claiming that statistics as a whole is a subdiscipline CLT, which is even more unjustified.

[[User:BlaiseFEgan|Blaise]] 17:50, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

:Good point. I changed the list to "approaches" rather than subdisciplines. The theoretical underpinnings for many of these approaches arose outside of CLT. -- [[User:Hike395|hike395]] 23:11, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== Category ==

The [[:Category:Machine learning]] is a bit overfull. Anyone here up for organizing the relevant terms from ''computational learning theory'' in an appropriate subcategory? Thank you. --[[User:Chire|Chire]] ([[User talk:Chire|talk]]) 16:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

== Cleaning Up References ==

While there is a references section at the end, citations to those references need to be worked into the body of the text. I suspect the existing references are sufficient for all current uncited claims. [[User:Stellaathena|Stellaathena]] ([[User talk:Stellaathena|talk]]) 20:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)