Content deleted Content added
→Newton–Størmer–Verlet: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Maths rating}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: field. Tag: |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{WikiProject Mathematics| importance = low }}
}}
== Initial discussion ==
Line 43 ⟶ 44:
Agreed. I was surprised to see this labeled as "semi-implicit" Euler. Under that name I would have expected something like the Crank-Nicolson method. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.163.53.10|24.163.53.10]] ([[User talk:24.163.53.10|talk]]) 01:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
This name is vague to me, since I've seen semi-implicit Euler to mean many things. Some people call any IMEX semi-implicit Euler, e.g. This is the first time I've seen it used for symplectic Euler. I don't know if the best way to address this is to create multiple sections for the different meanings. [[User:Fish sounds|Fish sounds]] ([[User talk:Fish sounds|talk]]) 02:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Indeed the name is overloaded. At the very least this page should warn readers that there are a large group of people who use this term to mean something else. See for instance the paper "[https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF01400352.pdf One-step and Extrapolation Methods for Differential-Algebraic Systems]" published in Numer. Math. 51,501-516 (1987).
== Arguments of ''f'' and ''g'' ==
Line 76 ⟶ 81:
}}</ref> pp.4,5.
[[User:SaltedPretzel|SaltedPretzel]] ([[User talk:SaltedPretzel|talk]]) 08:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
| |||