Content deleted Content added
Articles which refer to how chaotic fluid dynamics leads to the probabilistic results of experiments. The chaotic fluid is the strongly interactive dark matter. |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Physics}}. Tag: |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{
}}
== Another meaning ==
SIMP is also an acronym for MITRE's "Simple Instant Messaging and Presence" protocol.
Line 31 ⟶ 32:
http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2014/fluid-systems-quantum-mechanics-0912
*
▲* asure a bouncing droplet’s position accurately enough to predict its trajectory very far into the future. But in a recent series of papers, Bush, MIT professor of applied mathematics Ruben Rosales, and graduate students Anand Oza and Dan Harris applied their pilot-wave theory to show how chaotic pilot-wave dynamics leads to the quantumlike statistics observed in their experiments.”
A “fluidic pilot-wave system” is the strongly interacting dark matter.
Line 41 ⟶ 40:
* “If you have a system that is deterministic and is what we call in the business ‘chaotic,’ or sensitive to initial conditions, sensitive to perturbations, then it can behave probabilistically,” Milewski continues. “Experiments like this weren’t available to the giants of quantum mechanics. They also didn’t know anything about chaos. Suppose these guys — who were puzzled by why the world behaves in this strange probabilistic way — actually had access to experiments like this and had the knowledge of chaos, would they have come up with an equivalent, deterministic theory of quantum mechanics, which is not the current one? That’s what I find exciting from the quantum perspective.”
'1st place: Shifting the morals of quantum measurement'
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2011/dec/16/physics-world-reveals-its-top-10-breakthroughs-for-2011
* "Using an emerging technique called "weak measurement", the team is the first to track the average paths of single photons passing through a Young's double-slit experiment – something that Steinberg says physicists had been "brainwashed" into thinking is impossible."
'Quantum mechanics rule 'bent' in classic experiment'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13626587
* "For his part, Professor Steinberg believes that the result reduces a limitation not on quantum physics but on physicists themselves. "I feel like we're starting to pull back a veil on what nature really is," he said. "The trouble with quantum mechanics is that while we've learned to calculate the outcomes of all sorts of experiments, we've lost much of our ability to describe what is really happening in any natural language. I think that this has really hampered our ability to make progress, to come up with new ideas and see intuitively how new systems ought to behave.""
'New 'Double Slit' Experiment Skirts Uncertainty Principle'
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-double-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle
* "Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."
What waves in a double slit experiment is the strongly interactive dark matter.
Line 48 ⟶ 62:
[[User:Aetherdisplacement|Aetherdisplacement]] ([[User talk:Aetherdisplacement|talk]]) 12:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
==DAMA Reference==
Reference 12 in "SIMPs annhilations would produce significant heat. DAMA set limits with NaITl crystals.[12]" doesn't seem to support this sentence but instead refers to heat flow in Uranus, which is covered in the next paragraph/sentence which is referenced by [13]. Do we need change the referencing? [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] ([[User talk:RJFJR|talk]]) 15:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
: I think so. I've moved ref 12 and flagged it. - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 14:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
== Is this exactly the same as strongly interacting dark matter ==
Is this exactly the same as ''strongly interacting dark matter'' ? That's what most of the references talk about. Perhaps this article should be split or renamed or the relationship clarified ? - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 04:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
:Good catch, but I think the phrase you use was never particularly common because SIMP is more catchy and because SIDM is already an acronym for something else. And scientists have a sense of humor ... SIMP was already funny because it rhymes with WIMP, but now we have a whole new meaning coming into fashion. [[user:Soap|—]]<span style="background-color: #a6ffe0; padding: 3px; border-radius: 6px 6px 6px 6px;"><b>[[user talk:Soap|Soap]]</b></span>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|—]] 14:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
== simp ==
simp <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49|2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49]] ([[User talk:2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49#top|talk]]) 22:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== "Simp" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Simp]]. Please participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 3#Simp|the redirect discussion]] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> —[[User:SpanishSnake|SpanishSnake]] ([[User_talk:SpanishSnake|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SpanishSnake|contribs]]) 17:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||