Content deleted Content added
→Section for review: More articles which refer to wave-particle duality as a moving particle AND its associated wave |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{Physics}}. Tag: |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{
}}
== Another meaning ==
SIMP is also an acronym for MITRE's "Simple Instant Messaging and Presence" protocol.
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-double-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle
* "Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."
What waves in a double slit experiment is the strongly interactive dark matter.
Line 62:
[[User:Aetherdisplacement|Aetherdisplacement]] ([[User talk:Aetherdisplacement|talk]]) 12:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
==DAMA Reference==
Reference 12 in "SIMPs annhilations would produce significant heat. DAMA set limits with NaITl crystals.[12]" doesn't seem to support this sentence but instead refers to heat flow in Uranus, which is covered in the next paragraph/sentence which is referenced by [13]. Do we need change the referencing? [[User:RJFJR|RJFJR]] ([[User talk:RJFJR|talk]]) 15:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
: I think so. I've moved ref 12 and flagged it. - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 14:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
== Is this exactly the same as strongly interacting dark matter ==
Is this exactly the same as ''strongly interacting dark matter'' ? That's what most of the references talk about. Perhaps this article should be split or renamed or the relationship clarified ? - [[User:Rod57|Rod57]] ([[User talk:Rod57|talk]]) 04:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
:Good catch, but I think the phrase you use was never particularly common because SIMP is more catchy and because SIDM is already an acronym for something else. And scientists have a sense of humor ... SIMP was already funny because it rhymes with WIMP, but now we have a whole new meaning coming into fashion. [[user:Soap|—]]<span style="background-color: #a6ffe0; padding: 3px; border-radius: 6px 6px 6px 6px;"><b>[[user talk:Soap|Soap]]</b></span>[[Special:Contributions/Soap|—]] 14:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
== simp ==
simp <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49|2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49]] ([[User talk:2001:56A:F390:2A00:9CC0:E73E:E108:2E49#top|talk]]) 22:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== "Simp" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|left]]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect [[Simp]]. Please participate in [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 3#Simp|the redirect discussion]] if you wish to do so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> —[[User:SpanishSnake|SpanishSnake]] ([[User_talk:SpanishSnake|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/SpanishSnake|contribs]]) 17:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
|