Content deleted Content added
Please help avoid deletion. |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Cryptocurrency}}. Tag: |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Cryptocurrency|importance=Low}}
}}
==Untitled==
Hi--Sorry, I'm new to this. T-K technology is contained and acknowledged in the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard for timestamping, which is a superset of the X.509 standard that is commonplace on the Internet. Admittedly, it is an emerging technology, but I could find no guidelines with regard to writing articles on emerging technologies on Wikipedia.
Additionally, there do seem to be a number of entries for trademarked terms. For example, the "iPhone" article refers to a trademarked product released in June of this year (http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html). Please help. [[User:Skulvis|Skulvis]] 18:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
:Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|provide sources]] to establish the subject's [[Wikipedia:notability|notability]]. Of course, the need for [[Wikipedia:sources|sources]] goes beyond notability. Information added to an article must be [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]], and facts included must be [[Wikipedia:attributed|attributed]] to a [[Wikipedia:reliable source|reliable source]]. Thanks. --[[User:Evb-wiki|Evb-wiki]] 18:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
::Yeah, it's not actually a problem to write about a topic that has a trademarked name. It's just that, as a whole, this looks like a posting designed to bring a higher level of visibility to a corporate property, which is frowned upon. I'll check out the ANSI standard, to see if that qualifies. [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup> 20:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Can I get some clarification as to what is specifically objectionable in the article? Again, the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard is a national standard that has been developed over the course of many years and has received contribution and endorsement from many commercial and academic organizations. Isn't that a verifiable and reliable third-party source? I am worried that the article will be deleted, and I will have learned little about why. [[User:Skulvis|Skulvis]] 19:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed deletion template based on continuing discussion on the talk page of [[User:Mangojuice|Mango]][[Special:Contributions/Mangojuice|<span style="color:orange">'''juice'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Mangojuice|talk]]</sup>. [[User:Skulvis|Skulvis]] 03:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
| |||