Content deleted Content added
Bailey.d.r (talk | contribs) emptying the sea with a bucket |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}, {{WikiProject Systems}}. Tag: |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{afd-merged-from|RDP technique|RDP technique|14 March 2009|date=March 2009}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Computing
{{WikiProject Method engineering}}
{{WikiProject Systems
}}
{{archive box|<center>[[/Archive 1|2004-2007]]</center>}}
Line 114:
[[Extreme Programming]] → {{no redirect|1=Extreme programming}} –
Per [[WP:CAPS]] ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and [[WP:TITLE]], this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles.
:Compare [[IBM Rational Unified Process]]. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mmeijeri|Mmeijeri]] ([[User talk:Mmeijeri|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mmeijeri|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
::Good point. That one is an IBM trademark, and very hard to find lowercase in sources, unlike "extreme programming". [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 17:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Line 121:
*'''Support''' – "almost always" would be enough, if it were true, to convince us that it's a proper name; but it's not. Many sources use lower case; especially when you get away from the primary sources that are promoting the concept. In recent years, the generic lowercase may even be in the majority. See [http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=in+Extreme+Programming%2Cin+extreme+programming&year_start=1995&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=0 n-grams] and [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22in%20Extreme%20Programming%22&tbs=bks:1&lr=lang_en#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&lr=lang_en&tbs=lr:lang_1en&tbm=bks&source=hp&q=%22in+Extreme+Programming%22+-intitle%3A%22Extreme+Programming%22&pbx=1&oq=%22in+Extreme+Programming%22+-intitle:%22Extreme+Programming%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=1&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=17198l18172l0l18908l3l3l0l0l0l1l694l1715l3-1.0.2l3l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=b6878b6a2b661426&biw=1381&bih=779 books that don't have "Extreme Programming" in their titles]. [[User:Dicklyon|Dicklyon]] ([[User talk:Dicklyon|talk]]) 05:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
::Note: it's a methodology, not a piece of named software. That should settle it.
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
== Design section citation ==
Line 131:
Can somebody knowledgeable add a list of notable users of this methodology?[[Special:Contributions/216.96.233.118|216.96.233.118]] ([[User talk:216.96.233.118|talk]]) 19:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
: I just wanted to say finaly there is normal representation of the practice (as image), although it is the same as agile, but lets say it can be here too. --[[User:Alexonline2|Alexonline2]] ([[User talk:Alexonline2|talk]]) 17:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
Line 166 ⟶ 167:
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 17:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
== (Missing header) ==
I have no idea to how to edit, but I'm not sure where this idea of the relevancy of prescription of treating "proper" nouns as prescriptive comes from. It's difficult to take anyone who resists popular nomenclature seriously as a descriptivist, and it's not clear what the value of an article could be without claiming such a standard of narrative. I would expect, at minimum, an argument of value to persuade others to break from descriptive nomenclature. I'm not sure how editing works around here, but editing clearly failed here. It's not clear what goal the editor who named this ideology is trying to advance by altering the name. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Bailey.d.r|Bailey.d.r]] ([[User talk:Bailey.d.r#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Bailey.d.r|contribs]]) 21:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)</span>
== nonsense ==
buzz words and nonsense in the first two paragraphs. the tldr of xp is programming in pairs. two people going over the same code, ideally sitting in front of the same computer, while discussing it. keep agile etc buzzwords out please [[Special:Contributions/122.135.184.157|122.135.184.157]] ([[User talk:122.135.184.157|talk]]) 11:28, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
== Software process (methodology) or framework... or practice? ==
According to this article, it is a "software development process"; that means it is extremely well defined and ready for use with almost no adaptation. But, according to the Agile Alliance, it is a framework (https://www.agilealliance.org/glossary/xp/); that means it must be "customized" (at least minimally). The Agile Alliance states that each team and project requires a methodology which must be defined from one or more frameworks and practices. I doubt it is "just" a practice as it has too many details and its scope is quite large. [[User:George Rodney Maruri Game|George Rodney Maruri Game]] ([[User talk:George Rodney Maruri Game|talk]]) 21:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
| |||