Talk:Joint Service Small Arms Program: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 20:15, 9 October 2006 edit Looper5920 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 48,145 edits assessed ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 21:56, 15 February 2024 edit undo Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 8,374,666 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=C\| ~~{{WPMILHIST~~ {{WikiProject Military history\|class=C\|b1=no\|b2=yes\|b3=yes\|b4=yes\|b5=yes\|US-task-force= yes\|Weaponry-task-force= yes}} ~~\|class= Start~~ ~~\|US-task-force= yes~~ ~~\|Weaponry-task-force= yes~~ }} FWIW: This has become more of a summary of the XM9 pistol trials than the actual Joint Service Small Arms Program. JSSAP's mission and history encompasses more than just the XM9. [[User:D.E. Watters\|D.E. Watters]] ([[User talk:D.E. Watters\|talk]]) 12:48, 25 September 2018 (UTC) == Prose == Does anyone else find the overall prose and grammar of this article to be lacking or downright bad? While informative, it feels as though it were written in a rush or was written for someone of a very elementary reading level. I'd make changes but I am not an expert in this topic/event, and I'd loathe to make changes that adjust meaning or intent due to my own misunderstandings/lack of knowledge. [[User:SpecialAgentCake\|SpecialAgentCake]] ([[User talk:SpecialAgentCake\|talk]]) 18:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)