Talk:Welsh devolution: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:46, 14 January 2024

Latest revision as of 03:27, 25 February 2024

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 26:

| collapse =

}}

{{WikiProject Walesbanner shell|class=B |importance1=top

{{WikiProject Wales

| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes

| importance = Top

| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes

}}

| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes

{{WikiProject Celts |class=B |importance=topTop}}

| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes

{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=B|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes|importance=midMid}}

| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes}}

}}

{{WikiProject Celts |class=B |importance=top}}

{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|class=B|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes|importance=mid}}

== Roman history is not relevant to [[devolution]] ==

Line 123 ⟶ 122:

:It's a news report which picks up on one comment from one person and makes a headline out of it. We don't want pages that are following newspapers. There must surely be much better secondary sources analysing that referendum. What can we learn from them? [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 08:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

::Just thought it might add a bit more depth and variety to the understanding of the factors influencing the referendum. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 01:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

:::Might also be a valuable addition to [[1997 Welsh devolution referendum]] [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 01:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

== Update needed: Constitutional Commission ==

https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2024-01/independent-commission-on-the-constitutional-future-of-wales-final-report.pdf

There are various secondary sources to look at in the news, all published today. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 17:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)