Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Wales, Celts, Politics of the United Kingdom, +banner shell (B) (Rater) |
m →top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layout |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 26:
| collapse =
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell
{{WikiProject Wales
| importance = Top
}}
{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=Mid
▲{{WikiProject Celts |importance=Top}}
▲{{WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom|importance=Mid|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|b6=yes}}
}}
Line 126 ⟶ 122:
:It's a news report which picks up on one comment from one person and makes a headline out of it. We don't want pages that are following newspapers. There must surely be much better secondary sources analysing that referendum. What can we learn from them? [[User:Sirfurboy|Sirfurboy🏄]] ([[User talk:Sirfurboy|talk]]) 08:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
::Just thought it might add a bit more depth and variety to the understanding of the factors influencing the referendum. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 01:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Might also be a valuable addition to [[1997 Welsh devolution referendum]] [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 01:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
== Update needed: Constitutional Commission ==
https://www.gov.wales/sites/default/files/publications/2024-01/independent-commission-on-the-constitutional-future-of-wales-final-report.pdf
There are various secondary sources to look at in the news, all published today. [[User:Titus Gold|Titus Gold]] ([[User talk:Titus Gold|talk]]) 17:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
|