Classical modal logic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nortexoid (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
sorry, I have to revert again; Botterweg14 undid your changes using a sound argument; this needs to be discussed further on the template's talk page
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{refimprove|date = January 2009}}
In [[modal logic]], a '''classical modal logic''' '''L''' is any modal logic containing (as axiom or theorem)
 
In [[modal logic]], a '''classical modal logic''' '''L''' is any modal logic containing (as axiom or theorem) the [[duality (mathematics)|duality]] of the modal operators
<math>\Diamond A \equiv \lnot\Box\lnot A</math>
 
:<math>\Diamond A \equivleftrightarrow \lnot\Box\lnot A</math>
and being closed under the rule
 
that is also [[Deductive closure|closed]] under the rule
<math> A \equiv B \vdash \Box A\equiv\Box B.</math>
 
:<math>\frac{ A \equivleftrightarrow B \vdash }{\Box A\equivleftrightarrow \Box B}.</math>
Alternatively one can give a dual definition of '''L''' by which '''L''' is classical iff it contains (as axiom or theorem)
 
Alternatively, one can give a dual definition of '''L''' by which '''L''' is classical iff[[if and only if]] it contains (as axiom or theorem)
<math>\Box A \equiv \lnot\Diamond\lnot A</math>
 
:<math>\Box A \equivleftrightarrow \lnot\Diamond\lnot A</math>
 
and is closed under the rule
 
:<math>\frac{ A \equivleftrightarrow B \vdash }{\Diamond A\equivleftrightarrow \Diamond B}.</math>
 
The weakest classical system is sometimes referred to as '''E''' and is [[normal modal logic|non-normal]]. Both [[algebraic semantics (mathematical logic)|algebraic]] and [[neighborhood semantics]] characterize familiar classical modal systems that are weaker than the weakest normal modal logic '''K'''.
 
Every [[regular modal logic]] is classical, and every [[normal modal logic]] is regular and hence classical.
== References ==
Chellas, Brian. ''Modal Logic: An Introduction''. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
 
== References ==
[[Category:Logic]]
{{reflist}}
* Chellas, Brian. ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=YupiXWV5j6cC&q=%22Classical+modal+logic%22&pg=PR7 Modal Logic: An Introduction]''. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Classical Modal Logic}}
[[Category:Modal logic]]
 
{{logic-stub}}