Talk:Arithmetic function: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:45, 2 October 2023

Latest revision as of 23:36, 8 March 2024

(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{VitalWikiProject articlebanner shell|class=B|levelvital=5yes|topic1=Mathematics}}

{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=mid}}

{{maths rating

|field=number theory

|importance=mid

|class=B

|vital=

|historical=

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

Line 17 ⟶ 12:

}}

{{Archive box |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=12 |units=months |auto=yes }}

== Parsing error? ==

In the divisor convolution subsection, I see a parsing error for the sigma_5 and sigma_7 formulas when viewing the whole page, but not when in preview of just that section. The same thing is happening in the class number section. I cannot figure out what is going on. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 14:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

:Now, there would be no persing error because I have recompiled this article. Perhaps it might be temporal errors. --[[User:Enyokoyama|Enyokoyama]] ([[User talk:Enyokoyama|talk]]) 15:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

== Error in formula ==

Line 110 ⟶ 101:

::{{ping|Sapphorain}} Greetings! When you say "all are easily verifiable", do you mean that the reader should follow links to other articles to find citations that support statements made in the [[Arithmetic function|Arithmetic Function]] article? An example would help. I am not trying to refute you. I just want to learn more about standards for verifiability. Cordially, [[User:BuzzWeiser196|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196|talk]]) 10:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

: I mean by that that the material in the sections you list is very elementary and can be found in the various textbooks given as general references in the article: for instance Apostol’s introduction, the Hardy and Wright, the Landau, the Niven-Zuckerman-Herbert, the Bateman-Diamond. All the items in these sections are thus easily ''verifiable'' and don’t ''require'' each time a footnote citing a title and a page. But of course you are welcome to insert such footnotes if you feel like it. --[[User:Sapphorain|Sapphorain]] ([[User talk:Sapphorain|talk]]) 18:44, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

::@Sapphorain: Now I understand. After reading [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], it seems that this article's "Further Reading" and "External Links" are what are termed "general references...that are usually found in underdeveloped articles." This article is far from underdeveloped. It's quite learned, and would benefit greatly from inline citations, which Wikipedia favors in a case like this. I wish I could help you with that task, but I don't have enough math training to take it on. My best to you! [[User:BuzzWeiser196|BuzzWeiser196]] ([[User talk:BuzzWeiser196|talk]]) 19:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

== First 100 values of some arithmetic functions ==

Note that in the table called "First 100 values of some arithmetic functions", there are two functions, both called lambda(n). In the code, one has a capital L and one has a small l. [[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C7:9985:1701:963:1B25:CFBB:3FFA|2A00:23C7:9985:1701:963:1B25:CFBB:3FFA]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C7:9985:1701:963:1B25:CFBB:3FFA|talk]]) 12:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

:Indeed; I've fixed it. Thanks for noticing! --[[User:JayBeeEll|JBL]] ([[User_talk:JayBeeEll|talk]]) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)