Talk:Inverse function rule: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:10, 26 October 2018

Latest revision as of 01:29, 9 March 2024

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

{{WikiProject Mathematics|importance=mid}}

}}

Old arguments deleted. Look `em up in the history pages.

Line 132 ⟶ 135:

I also highly urge that Euler's notation should be inroduced and the concepts be developed using it.--[[User:Gustav Ulsh Iler|Gustav Ulsh Iler]] ([[User talk:Gustav Ulsh Iler|talk]]) 03:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

------

===========================

This is my first time encountering this page. The material is helpful, but lacks citations and seems like a loose end. I propose paring it down and adding it as a subsection to the page on the inverse function theorem. What do folks think about that?

Also, what are some good references for this material? I think that a reference in the spirit of spivak or rudin would be good, in addition to a more elementary source.

-[[user:Tomhallward|Tomhallward]]([[User talk:Tomhallward|talk]])

== Notation is extremely confusing ==

Since there are two variables in the introductory section, there should be at least one notation that refers explicitly to which variables the derivative is with respect to. Since this is an introductory page, writers should not assume readers will pick up on implicit (really, lazy) notation. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.84.199.178|68.84.199.178]] ([[User talk:68.84.199.178#top|talk]]) 05:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->