Content deleted Content added
Historyday01 (talk | contribs) |
Historyday01 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Old AfD multi |date=17 July 2021 |result='''keep''' |page=Queer coding}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Articles for creation
{{WikiProject LGBT studies
{{WikiProject Media
}}
{{old move|date=31 October 2022|destination=Queercoding|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1120042749#Requested move 31 October 2022}}
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-01-27">27 January 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-05-19">19 May 2021</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Channel_Islands/Introduction_to_LGBT_Studies_(Spring_2021)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Amanda342|Amanda342]].
Line 39 ⟶ 41:
:::To some extent perhaps, but surprisingly enough the popular media can be at times be even more inclined to exaggerate "queerness" than that field. I haven't looked at all the sources above, but some are like that. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 02:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
:::Uh... Anachronist, that's not how the [[WP:INDEPENDENT|independence]] of sources work. Never do sources about social concepts have to have subjects be disconnected from an academic field, per se, because articles and journal are normally peer-reviewed. But, disregarding that, these are two academic pieces that have the phrase in their headline, are mainly about the topic, and are from academic journals not generally about LGBT issues: [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13110/marvelstales.29.1.0110] and [https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/intellect/fspc/2018/00000005/00000002/art00006] [[User:HumanxAnthro|👨x🐱]] ([[User talk:HumanxAnthro|talk]]) 03:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
:Going to try using these in the future if I have some time to add them in. I would say the articles in [https://theconversation.com/luca-disney-and-queerbaiting-in-animation-164349 The Conversation], [https://www.insider.com/luca-lgbt-gay-queer-coded-2021-6 Insider], [https://slate.com/culture/2021/06/luca-movie-disney-pixar-gay-allegory.html Slate] are good when it comes to Luca, as is [https://www.wired.com/story/loki-marvel-queer-character/ Wired] when it comes to Loki, [https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/movies/2019/07/17/new-lion-king-biggest-changes-from-original-animated-movie/1738202001/ USA Today] when it comes to the new Lion King, [https://www.vox.com/culture/21417212/what-are-the-gayest-disney-films-mulan-queer-subtext Vox] when it comes to Mulan, [https://www.cjr.org/special_report/queer-media-bachelor-magazine.php CJR] when it comes to queer-coded publications in the past, the academic article "[https://academic.oup.com/adaptation/article-abstract/13/1/98/5540147 The Snow Queer? Female Characterization in Walt Disney’s Frozen]", and other articles in [http://www.quailbellmagazine.com/the-real/social-issues-queerness-and-media-representation Quail Bell], [https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/the-strange-difficult-history-of-queer-coding Syfy], [https://collider.com/queer-coded-villains-in-film-erasure/ Collider], [https://www.insider.com/the-evolution-of-queer-characters-in-kids-animated-tv-shows-2021-6 Insider], [https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/07/t-magazine/gay-children-book-authors.html New York Times] (small mention), and [https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=w-n5DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT263&dq=%22queer+coding%22+%22disney%22&ots=EoH5v2hL4L&sig=PzgYhxsOmoRQAtKcXuWypn26vH4#v=onepage&q=%22queer%20coding%22%20%22disney%22&f=false the chapter] in "Disney Channel Tween Programming". And there are undoubtedly many more articles out there when it comes to queer coding. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 22:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
== Proposed merge of [[Sissy villain]] into [[Queer coding]] ==
Line 56 ⟶ 59:
:Not sure. I can look into it later... [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 19:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
== Requested move 31 October 2022 ==
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''
The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' {{strong|Speedy close}}: the OP was blocked as a sockpuppet and no one else has supported the move. Anyone should feel free to start a new discussion if they support a move. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 20:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
----
[[:Queer coding]] → {{no redirect|Queercoding}} – This article's title should be [[Queercoding]] or [[Queer-coding]]. [[User:QueenofBithynia|QueenofBithynia]] ([[User talk:QueenofBithynia|talk]]) 18:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
:Hmm. Is there evidence in reliable sources that "Queercoding" is used more than "Queer coding"? If there is, then it should be moved. If there isn't, then it shouldn't be moved. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 20:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
*'''Oppose'''. No reasons are given for why this article should be moved. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007|talk]]) 00:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
*:The current title is grammatically incorrect and does not follow the convention used in the sources cited in the article. [[User:QueenofBithynia|QueenofBithynia]] ([[User talk:QueenofBithynia|talk]]) 18:26, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
:::I'm not convinced that's true. "Queercoding and "queer-coding" don't even show up on the [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=queer+coding%2Cqueercoding%2Cqueer-coding&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cqueer%20coding%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngrams], but "queen coding" does. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007|talk]]) 00:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''', reads oddly and no evidence has been given that the scrunched-together version is more common in sources. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]</sup> 23:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''', in line with Crossroads and Rreagan007. I understand what QueenofBithynia is saying, that the "current title is grammatically incorrect", but for one I'm not sure about that, and secondly, is there evidence that "Queercoding" is a common term above "Queer coding"? No such evidence has been provided as of yet. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 20:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>
==Wiki Education assignment: History of Sexualities==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/The_College_of_Wooster/History_of_Sexualities_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:Thenerdiestninja|Thenerdiestninja]] | start_date = 2022-08-25 | end_date = 2022-12-15 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:LivMourning|LivMourning]] ([[User talk:LivMourning|talk]]) 21:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)</span>
==Wiki Education assignment: American Cinema History==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Alabama-Huntsville/American_Cinema_History_(Fall_2023) | assignments = [[User:UttRen0002|UttRen0002]] | start_date = 2023-08-17 | end_date = 2023-12-08 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:UttRen0002|UttRen0002]] ([[User talk:UttRen0002|talk]]) 18:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)</span>
== Excessive focus on television/animation ==
Covering examples of queer coding in animation is important but this article is subpar coverage of an extremely important part of film history. It includes 0 examples of queer coding in film from the actual Hays code era and disproportionately focuses on animated television and film, and only mentions 2 live action films, both of which are contemporary series that lacked the restrictions of older films. [[User:Teddybearbutch|Teddybearbutch]] ([[User talk:Teddybearbutch|talk]]) 22:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
:I think this may have to do with content which was merged into this article from elsewhere. I wouldn't mind there being MORE examples of queer coding from the Hays Code era. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 16:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
| |||