Talk:Queer coding: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:05, 4 November 2022

Latest revision as of 16:33, 23 March 2024

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Talk header}}

{{Old AfD multi |date=17 July 2021 |result='''keep''' |page=Queer coding}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|1class=Start|

{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=start|ts=20200319042219|reviewer=MatthewVanitas|oldid=930433109}}

{{WikiProject LGBT studies|class=start}}

{{WikiProject Media|class=start}}

}}

{{old move|date=31 October 2022|destination=Queercoding|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1120042749#Requested move 31 October 2022}}

==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==

[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-01-27">27 January 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-05-19">19 May 2021</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/California_State_University_Channel_Islands/Introduction_to_LGBT_Studies_(Spring_2021)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Amanda342|Amanda342]].

Line 60 ⟶ 62:

== Requested move 31 October 2022 ==

<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->

{{requested move/dated|Queercoding}}

:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. ''

The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' {{strong|Speedy close}}: the OP was blocked as a sockpuppet and no one else has supported the move. Anyone should feel free to start a new discussion if they support a move. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure|non-admin closure]])</small> [[User:Firefangledfeathers|Firefangledfeathers]] ([[User talk:Firefangledfeathers|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Firefangledfeathers|contribs]]) 20:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

----

[[:Queer coding]] → {{no redirect|Queercoding}} – This article's title should be [[Queercoding]] or [[Queer-coding]]. [[User:QueenofBithynia|QueenofBithynia]] ([[User talk:QueenofBithynia|talk]]) 18:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Line 69 ⟶ 75:

:::I'm not convinced that's true. "Queercoding and "queer-coding" don't even show up on the [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=queer+coding%2Cqueercoding%2Cqueer-coding&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cqueer%20coding%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngrams], but "queen coding" does. [[User:Rreagan007|Rreagan007]] ([[User talk:Rreagan007|talk]]) 00:21, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

*'''Oppose''', reads oddly and no evidence has been given that the scrunched-together version is more common in sources. <span style="font-family:Palatino">[[User:Crossroads|'''Crossroads''']]</span> ^{[[User talk:Crossroads|-talk-]]} 23:20, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

*'''Oppose''', in line with Crossroads and Rreagan007. I understand what QueenofBithynia is saying, that the "current title is grammatically incorrect", but for one I'm not sure about that, and secondly, is there evidence that "Queercoding" is a common term above "queerQueer coding"? No such evidence has been provided as of yet. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 20:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->

</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>

==Wiki Education assignment: History of Sexualities==

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/The_College_of_Wooster/History_of_Sexualities_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:Thenerdiestninja|Thenerdiestninja]] | start_date = 2022-08-25 | end_date = 2022-12-15 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:LivMourning|LivMourning]] ([[User talk:LivMourning|talk]]) 21:53, 13 December 2022 (UTC)</span>

==Wiki Education assignment: American Cinema History==

{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Alabama-Huntsville/American_Cinema_History_(Fall_2023) | assignments = [[User:UttRen0002|UttRen0002]] | start_date = 2023-08-17 | end_date = 2023-12-08 }}

<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:UttRen0002|UttRen0002]] ([[User talk:UttRen0002|talk]]) 18:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)</span>

== Excessive focus on television/animation ==

Covering examples of queer coding in animation is important but this article is subpar coverage of an extremely important part of film history. It includes 0 examples of queer coding in film from the actual Hays code era and disproportionately focuses on animated television and film, and only mentions 2 live action films, both of which are contemporary series that lacked the restrictions of older films. [[User:Teddybearbutch|Teddybearbutch]] ([[User talk:Teddybearbutch|talk]]) 22:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

:I think this may have to do with content which was merged into this article from elsewhere. I wouldn't mind there being MORE examples of queer coding from the Hays Code era. [[User:Historyday01|Historyday01]] ([[User talk:Historyday01|talk]]) 16:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)