Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. The article is no longer a vital article. Tag: |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
{{WikiProject Mathematics|priority=Low }}
}}
== Was that a good idea? ==
Line 14 ⟶ 16:
::<math>i = \left\lfloor \sqrt{2(k+1)} - \frac{1}{2}\right\rfloor.</math>
:But you should probably find a [[WP:RS|reliable source]] for an equivalent formula before adding it to the article rather than taking my word for it. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
:: {{ping|David Eppstein}} "It does not make it any more accurate, rigorous, or correct to express the same thing in notation rather than words; it merely makes it harder for the uninitiated to understand." Wow, I'd like to strongly disagree. While ''some'' things can be said just as well in words, when things start getting complicated, the ambiguity of natural language often becomes a stumbling block.
:: When that happens (and it doesn't ''always'' happen, but I'm interpreting your words as suggesting that it ''never'' happens), the reader needs to "know what is meant" to resolve the ambiguity. That, IMHO, requires even more mathematical background than formal notation. (FWIW, the most common problem I have is running out of pronouns and having to come up with names. It can be unclear if two similar names refer to the same thing or there's supposed to be a distinction. If I use variable names, it's unambiguous.)
:: You're right that formal notation can be a barrier, which is why I like to say things twice, once each way. Lots of computer-related articles include both a prose description and source (pseudo)code for the same reason.
::It can also become ponderous to add all the side conditions in prose. Is the base case {{math|1=''i''=0}} or {{math|1=''i''=1}}? Is a theorem true for all primes, or only odd primes? Are negative integers included? Must the triangle be non-degenerate? It's not that such things can't be expressed in prose, but rather that they obscure the explanation. I like to include an informal description which omits such minor details in order to focus on the main idea, and include the details (which are necessary for correctness) in the formal description.
:: [[Special:Contributions/38.39.199.2|38.39.199.2]] ([[User talk:38.39.199.2|talk]]) 12:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
:::Such a thing might be helpful later in the article, but technicality is not good for the lead. By the way, I'm not convinced that (row, column) is the simpler way to index these things, at least for infinite triangles (the case mainly considered here). (column,row - column) with zero-based indexing gives a scheme in which the row is easily recovered as the sum of the two coordinates and in which the only condition is that both coordinates are non-negative.
| |||