Content deleted Content added
Figure 3 is a good figure but has a mislabeled column. A note was made in the figure description. |
m →Example problem: wikilinked Conjugate depth Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Computational technique}}
== Open
[[File:Open Channel Flow Energy Lines.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 1.''' Conceptual figure used to define terms in the energy equation.<ref>{{cite book|last=Chaudhry|first=M.H.|title=Open-Channel Flow|year=2008|publisher=Springer|___location=New York}}</ref>]]
[[File:E-y Diagram.jpg|thumb|'''Figure 2.''' A diagram showing the relationship for flow depth (y) and total Energy (E) for a given flow (Q). Note the ___location of
The energy equation used for [[open channel flow]] computations is a simplification of the Bernoulli Equation (See [[Bernoulli Principle]]), which takes into account pressure head, elevation head, and velocity head.
:<math>H = z+y+\frac{v^2}{2g}</math> <big>'''Equation 1'''</big>
For a given flow rate and channel geometry, there is a relationship between flow depth and total energy.
:<math>F_n=\frac{v}{(g\frac{A}{B})^{0.5}}</math> <big>'''Equation 2'''</big>
Under steady state flow conditions (e.g. no flood wave), open channel flow can be subdivided into three types of flow: uniform flow, gradually varying flow, and rapidly varying flow.
== Water
Typically, the STM is used to develop “surface water profiles,” or longitudinal representations of channel depth, for channels experiencing gradually varied flow.
[[File:Surface Water Profiles.jpg|Surface Water Profiles]]
Line 34 ⟶ 35:
:* There is a hydrostatic pressure distribution
== Standard
The STM numerically solves equation 3 through an iterative process. This can be done using the bisection or Newton-Raphson Method, and is essentially solving for total head at a specified ___location using equations 4 and 5 by varying depth at the specified ___location.<ref>{{cite book|last=Chaudhry|first=M.H.|title=Open-Channel Flow|year=2008|publisher=Springer|___location=New York}}</ref>
Line 44 ⟶ 45:
In order to use this technique, it is important to note you must have some understanding of the system you are modeling. For each gradually varied flow transition, you must know both boundary conditions and you must also calculate length of that transition. (e.g. For an M1 Profile, you must find the rise at the downstream boundary condition, the normal depth at the upstream boundary condition, and also the length of the transition.) To find the length of the gradually varied flow transitions, iterate the “step length”, instead of height, at the boundary condition height until equations 4 and 5 agree. (e.g. For an M1 Profile, position 1 would be the downstream condition and you would solve for position two where the height is equal to normal depth.)
=== Newton–Raphson numerical method ===
[[File:NewtonRaphsonMethod.jpg|NewtonRaphsonMethod]]
Computer programs like excel contain iteration or goal seek functions that can automatically calculate the actual depth instead of manual iteration.
=== Conceptual
[[File:Sluice Gate Sketch.jpg|thumb| '''Figure 4.''' Illustration of surface water profiles associated with a sluice gate in a mild reach (top) and a steep reach (bottom).]]
Figure 4 illustrates the different surface water profiles associated with a sluice gate on a mild reach (top) and a steep reach (bottom). Note, the sluice gate induces a choke in the system, causing a “backwater” profile just upstream of the gate. In the mild reach, the [[hydraulic jump]] occurs downstream of the gate, but in the steep reach, the hydraulic jump occurs upstream of the gate. It is important to note that the gradually varied flow equations and associated numerical methods (including the standard step method) cannot accurately model the dynamics of a hydraulic jump.<ref>{{cite book|last=Chaudhry|first=M.H.|title=Open-Channel Flow|year=2008|publisher=Springer|___location=New York}}</ref> See the [[Hydraulic jumps in rectangular channels]] page for more information. Below, an example problem will use conceptual models to build a surface water profile using the STM.
== Example
[[File:Large Standard Step Method Problem Statement.jpg|700px|The problem statement chosen as an example work-through of the standard step method]]
<big>'''Solution'''</big>
[[File:Large Standard Step Method Step 1.jpg|650px|Calculations necessary for the first step in the standard step method]]
Line 73 ⟶ 71:
Using Figure 3 and knowledge of the upstream and downstream conditions and the depth values on either side of the gate, a general estimate of the profiles upstream and downstream of the gate can be generated. Upstream, the water surface must rise from a normal depth of 0.97 m to 9.21 m at the gate. The only way to do this on a mild reach is to follow an M1 profile. The same logic applies downstream to determine that the water surface follows an M3 profile from the gate until the depth reaches the [[conjugate depth]] of the normal depth at which point a hydraulic jump forms to raise the water surface to the normal depth.
'''Step 4:''' Use the Newton Raphson Method to solve the M1 and M3 surface water profiles. The upstream and downstream portions must be modeled separately with an initial depth of 9.21 m for the upstream portion, and 0.15 m for the downstream portion. The downstream depth should only be modeled until it reaches the conjugate depth of the normal depth, at which point a hydraulic jump will form. The solution presented explains how to solve the problem in a spreadsheet, showing the calculations column by column. Within Excel, the goal seek function can be used to set column 15 to 0 by changing the depth estimate in column 2 instead of iterating manually.
Line 100 ⟶ 98:
[[File:HEC-RAS Modle Upstream gate.jpg|650px|HEC-RAS upstream]]
[[File:HEC-RAS model Downstream of gate with jump.jpg|650px|HEC-RAS Downstream]]
Line 107 ⟶ 104:
HEC-RAS modeled the hydraulic jump to occur 18 meters downstream of the sluice gate.
[[File:Large Standard Step Comparison Table.jpg|500px|Comparison between standard step example problem calculations and HEC-RAS modeling results]]
|