Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Mzajac/Preliminary statements: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:12, 20 January 2024

Latest revision as of 21:00, 7 May 2024

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

{{Casenav|case name=Mzajac|clerk1=MJL|clerk2=Dreamy Jazz|clerk3=Firefly|draft arb=Aoidh|draft arb2=Moneytrees|draft arb3=Z1720|draft arb4=|active=12|inactive=2|recused=1||scope=Conduct of Mzajac|workshop-skipped=}}

{{casenav}}

Statements on this page are copies of the statements submitted in the original [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case|request]] to arbitrate this dispute, and serve as verbatim copies; therefore, they may not be edited or removed.

== Preliminary statements ==

Line 153:

Yes, decline the original case request but it's clear that Mzajac has not kept up with policies, important ones, if they ever knew them. I would suggest Mzajac voluntarily request retirement from admin duties at [[WP:BN]]. The project is too big and too complex for common sense to be enough anymore. And it is better for all parties that this end with a voluntary desysop than going through potentially cumbersome and unpleasant arbitration process only to end up with the same inevitable outcome. In light of another recent case, I suggest that arbcom should make it clear to Mzajac post-haste, that what is going on right now is, arbcom is considering desysopping them, whether by motion or by case, so they are not caught offguard. Regards! '''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]]''' [[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]] 04:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

=== (non-Arbitrator) Statement by Wugapodes ===

<small>(Non-Arbitrator comment)</small> I think Blablubbs says it well: {{tq|WHEEL is concerned with not having admins combatively use reinstatements in lieu of dispute resolution, but what happened here doesn't strike me as that}}. This doesn't look like a wheel war; it looks like a comedy of errors that happened to involve the delete button. Aquillon lays out the plot of the farce well, and I come to the same conclusion even ignoring the fact that WHEEL changed in the middle of this discussion. I think, as Barkeep points out, the WHEEL aspect is really a non-starter, and the core issue is Michael's lack of familiarity with CSD and INVOLVED (good thing we have a bright line rule that brought this to your attention ''before'' it became a serious issue, but I digress). What to do about that? Depends on the committee's appetite, I guess. If anyone has any good "remedial admin training remedy" ideas sitting in their drafts, now's your time to shine, otherwise I'd say I doubt the outcome is going to be worth the time and effort. <span style="white-space: nowrap;">— [[User:Wugapodes|Wug·]][[User talk:Wugapodes|a·po·des]]</span> 06:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

=== Statement by Ymblanter ===