Content deleted Content added
→Recent reversions: :Agree, that while potentially "true", without actual reliable third party sources to support the "facts", it is just WP:OR. ~~~~ |
Wtshymanski (talk | contribs) ]]WP:NOTFORUM]], remark not about improving the article Undid revision 1221353996 by 61.5.16.182 (talk) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Television|importance=high}}▼
}}
▲|importance=high}}
== Provide an orientation ==
Contributors need an orientation, and a framework into which they can put their contribution (or withhold until they understand the overall framework that their own understanding fits. Many contributors merely understand their own limited environment, and presume to generalize. For example, mine is limited to a northern Virginia broadcast TV EPG on a digital converter. If I were to extrapolate, I might presume that most broadcasters are as careless as mine about accuracy, and reliability. It often takes weeks for changes in the program broadcasts to be reflected in the EPG. Some broadcasters provide nothing but the call sign & the channel #, with "No description". I don't suppose there is one clearinghouse for this information, but that viewers must contact each stationhouse manager to inform them of persistent malfunctions, because the station staff probably do not monitor their own EPG as well as they do their video(if at all).<br>
Line 65 ⟶ 64:
I have just undone an unsourced paragraph from another user who appears to have a potential conflict of interest related to Inview. I have also announced my own potential conflict of interest (related to AT&T) so I don't mean to step on any toes. However, I was following up on another editor (TheRedPenOfDoom) who performed similar reversions. At a minimum, content that states opinions about the difficulty of use or proper solution for EPG remote problems should be [[WP:V|sourced]]. When that is resolved we can talk about whether the proposed edits slant too much in any direction. Thank you for your understanding. [[Special:Contributions/12.153.112.21|12.153.112.21]] ([[User talk:12.153.112.21|talk]]) 17:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
:Agree, that while potentially "true", without actual reliable third party sources to support the "facts", it is just [[WP:OR]]. -- [[User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom|<span style="color:red;;;">TRPoD <small>aka The Red Pen of Doom</small></span>]] 18:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
== Use of Bold Typeface ==
Why so much use of bold in this article? I have not seen this on any other Wikipedia page, so it doesn't seem to conform to the usual style of Wikipedia.
Should the bolded words be changed to the standard typeface? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Marchino61|Marchino61]] ([[User talk:Marchino61|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Marchino61|contribs]]) 03:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:2|one external link|2 external links}} on [[Electronic program guide]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=756144954 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304051150/http://www.tvgenius.net/blog/2010/10/25/epgs-viewers-find/ to http://www.tvgenius.net/blog/2010/10/25/epgs-viewers-find/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111213050201/http://www.tvgenius.net:80/resources/white-papers/online-tv-guide-optimisation/ to http://www.tvgenius.net/resources/white-papers/online-tv-guide-optimisation/
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.embedded.com/columns/technicalinsights/209601833?_requestid=19509
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 08:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
== "(EPG's)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:(EPG's)]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 4#(EPG's)]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #3F00FF;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 19:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
== "Episode list" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px]]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:Episode list]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Episode list]] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #3F00FF;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 21:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
| |||