Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) m Reformat 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.1 |
m Fixing broken anchor: Reminder of an inactive anchor: statistical pitfalls |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Dutch energy scientist}}
'''Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen''' (born 1941, [[Dutch East Indies]])<ref>Charles Barton, [http://energyfromthorium.com/2008/03/23/david-fleming-and-jan-willem-storm-van-leeuwen/ David Fleming and Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen]</ref> is a consultant in chemistry and energy systems.
Storm van Leeuwen received his
==Nuclear energy study==
Line 6 ⟶ 7:
He is best known for the paper ''Nuclear power the energy balance'' that he wrote with Philip Smith (also named ''Stormsmith studies''), where they analyzed the energy payback from the entire nuclear power system. The energy inputs were calculated based on various assumptions and guesses about the technologies used in uranium production, rather than actually measuring them. They concluded that the major parameter determining the energy balance was the grade of the uranium ore, and ore grades lower than 180 ppm do not yield an energy gain when used in the nuclear fuel cycle.<ref name=original/>
The study was heavily criticized, such as a rebuttal by researchers from the [[Paul Scherrer Institute]].<ref>http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/Critical%20note%20GHG%20PSI.pdf Dones, Roberto, 2007. Critical note on the estimation by storm van Leeuwen J.W. and Smith P. of the energy uses and corresponding CO2 emissions from the complete nuclear energy chain. Paul Scherrer Institute Policy Report, April |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111011225201/http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/Critical%20note%20GHG%20PSI.pdf |archive-date=10 Oct 2011 |url-status=dead</ref>
With further criticism from Sevior and Flitney who issued the following statement:<ref name=ninfo/><ref name=wna/>
<blockquote>
Line 15 ⟶ 16:
Storm van Leeuwen noted that :
<blockquote>
''The method of Sevior and Flitney based on financial data appears to me full of hidden assumptions, bookkeeping problems, [[Statistical significance#Pitfalls|statistical pitfalls]]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-05-29|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|target_link=Statistical significance#Pitfalls|reason= The anchor (Pitfalls) [[Special:Diff/378689107|has been deleted]].}} and uncertainties.''
</blockquote>
The paper has been used by anti-nuclear organizations to claim that nuclear power is not clean enough to be considered a part of a clean energy mix.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.feasta.org/documents/energy/nuclear_power2.htm|title=Why Nuclear Power Cannot be a Major Energy Source|author=David Fleming|date=April 2006|
==Other papers==
{{See also|Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources}}
Storm van Leeuwen also presented his previous work as part of another non-[[peer reviewed]] controversial paper "''Secure Energy? Civil Nuclear Power, Security and Global Warming''",<ref name=storm2/> published by a [[think tank]], the [[Oxford Research Group]],
His original results has been used in a study<ref name=sydlen/> -'' Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Conversion and Management -'' with several modifications.
Line 30 ⟶ 31:
|title=Author Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen
|publisher=OpenDemocracy
|
|
|
|
}}</ref>
<!--This seems unrelated:
* ''Studien über die Wirkung von Coffein, Kaffee und coffeinfreiem Kaffee''
==Personal life==
Line 54:
| author=Martin Sevior
| date=2006-06-02
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=wna>{{cite web
Line 61:
| publisher=[[World Nuclear Association]]
| date=March 2006
|
| archive-date=2013-02-15
}}</ref>▼
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130215070759/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf11.html
| url-status=dead
▲ }}</ref>
<ref name=original>{{cite web
| url= http://www.stormsmith.nl
| title= Nuclear Energy: the Energy Balance
| author= Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen |author2=Philip Smith
| date= 30 July 2005 | format= [[PDF]]
▲ | accessdate= 2008-01-18
}}</ref>
<ref name=storm2med>{{cite web
Line 77 ⟶ 79:
|publisher=[[Business Week]]
|author=Moira Herbst
|
|
|
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=storm2>{{cite book
Line 91 ⟶ 92:
|date=March 2007
|pages=56
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=sydlen>
Line 99 ⟶ 100:
|last=Lenzen
|title=Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Conversion and Management
|
|
|publisher=University of Sydney
|year=2008
|page=69
|quote=[[Frank Barnaby]], James Kemp and others
|
|
}}
</ref>
Line 116:
|url=http://www.thetimes.co.za/PrintEdition/Article.aspx?id=633521
|title=The real cost of power
|
|date=2007-11-24
|
|
|
|
}}
*{{cite web
Line 130 ⟶ 129:
|publisher=Inter Press Services
|date=2007-04-19
|
|
|
|
}}
*{{cite web
Line 143 ⟶ 141:
|publisher=[[IAEA]]
|date=September 2005
|
|
|
|
}}
==External links==
*[http://www.stormsmith.nl Stormsmith]
{{authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Storm Van Leeuwen, Jan Willem}}
[[Category:1941 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:20th-century Dutch chemists]]
[[Category:Eindhoven University of Technology alumni]]
[[Category:Anti–nuclear power activists]]
| |||