Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Add: work. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were actually parameter name changes. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | All pages linked from cached copy of User:AManWithNoPlan/sandbox4 | via #UCB_webform_linked 1759/2209 |
m Fixing broken anchor: Reminder of an inactive anchor: statistical pitfalls |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Dutch energy scientist}}
'''Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen''' (born 1941, [[Dutch East Indies]])<ref>Charles Barton, [http://energyfromthorium.com/2008/03/23/david-fleming-and-jan-willem-storm-van-leeuwen/ David Fleming and Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen]</ref> is a consultant in chemistry and energy systems.
Storm van Leeuwen received his Master of Science, physical chemistry, at the Technical University Eindhoven. He is a senior scientist at Ceedata Consultants. He also develops courses for chemistry teachers for the Open University at Heerlen. He is the secretary of the Dutch Association of the [[Club of Rome]]. His two fields of expertise are technology assessment and life cycle analyses of energy systems, focussed on sustainability aspects. He published numerous reports and articles on various topics related to energy and environment, also in peer-reviewed scientific journals.<ref>{{cite journal
==Nuclear energy study==
Line 6 ⟶ 7:
He is best known for the paper ''Nuclear power the energy balance'' that he wrote with Philip Smith (also named ''Stormsmith studies''), where they analyzed the energy payback from the entire nuclear power system. The energy inputs were calculated based on various assumptions and guesses about the technologies used in uranium production, rather than actually measuring them. They concluded that the major parameter determining the energy balance was the grade of the uranium ore, and ore grades lower than 180 ppm do not yield an energy gain when used in the nuclear fuel cycle.<ref name=original/>
The study was heavily criticized, such as a rebuttal by researchers from the [[Paul Scherrer Institute]].<ref>http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/Critical%20note%20GHG%20PSI.pdf Dones, Roberto, 2007. Critical note on the estimation by storm van Leeuwen J.W. and Smith P. of the energy uses and corresponding CO2 emissions from the complete nuclear energy chain. Paul Scherrer Institute Policy Report, April |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111011225201/http://gabe.web.psi.ch/pdfs/Critical%20note%20GHG%20PSI.pdf |archive-date=10 Oct 2011 |url-status=dead</ref>
With further criticism from Sevior and Flitney who issued the following statement:<ref name=ninfo/><ref name=wna/>
<blockquote>
Line 15 ⟶ 16:
Storm van Leeuwen noted that :
<blockquote>
''The method of Sevior and Flitney based on financial data appears to me full of hidden assumptions, bookkeeping problems, [[Statistical significance#Pitfalls|statistical pitfalls]]{{Broken anchor|date=2024-05-29|bot=User:Cewbot/log/20201008/configuration|target_link=Statistical significance#Pitfalls|reason= The anchor (Pitfalls) [[Special:Diff/378689107|has been deleted]].}} and uncertainties.''
</blockquote>
The paper has been used by anti-nuclear organizations to claim that nuclear power is not clean enough to be considered a part of a clean energy mix.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.feasta.org/documents/energy/nuclear_power2.htm|title=Why Nuclear Power Cannot be a Major Energy Source|author=David Fleming|date=April 2006|
==Other papers==
{{See also|Life-cycle greenhouse-gas emissions of energy sources}}
Storm van Leeuwen also presented his previous work as part of another non-[[peer reviewed]] controversial paper "''Secure Energy? Civil Nuclear Power, Security and Global Warming''",<ref name=storm2/> published by a [[think tank]], the [[Oxford Research Group]], an institute unaffiliated with [[Oxford
His original results has been used in a study<ref name=sydlen/> -'' Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Conversion and Management -'' with several modifications.
Line 30 ⟶ 31:
|title=Author Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen
|publisher=OpenDemocracy
|
|url-status=dead
|
|
}}</ref>
<!--This seems unrelated:
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
| author=Martin Sevior
| date=2006-06-02
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=wna>{{cite web
Line 60 ⟶ 61:
| publisher=[[World Nuclear Association]]
| date=March 2006
|
| archive-date=2013-02-15
}}</ref>▼
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130215070759/http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf11.html
| url-status=dead
▲ }}</ref>
<ref name=original>{{cite web
| url= http://www.stormsmith.nl
| title= Nuclear Energy: the Energy Balance
| author= Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen |author2=Philip Smith
| date= 30 July 2005 | format= [[PDF]]
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=storm2med>{{cite web
Line 75 ⟶ 79:
|publisher=[[Business Week]]
|author=Moira Herbst
|
|url-status=dead
|
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=storm2>{{cite book
Line 88 ⟶ 92:
|date=March 2007
|pages=56
|
}}</ref>
<ref name=sydlen>
Line 97 ⟶ 101:
|title=Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review. Energy Conversion and Management
|url-status=dead
|
|publisher=University of Sydney
|year=2008
|page=69
|quote=[[Frank Barnaby]], James Kemp and others
|
|
}}
</ref>
Line 114 ⟶ 118:
|work=[[The Times]]
|date=2007-11-24
|
|url-status=dead
|
|
}}
*{{cite web
Line 125 ⟶ 129:
|publisher=Inter Press Services
|date=2007-04-19
|
|url-status=dead
|
|
}}
*{{cite web
Line 137 ⟶ 141:
|publisher=[[IAEA]]
|date=September 2005
|
|url-status=dead
|
|
}}
Line 151 ⟶ 155:
[[Category:1941 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:20th-century Dutch chemists]]
[[Category:Eindhoven University of Technology alumni]]
[[Category:Anti–nuclear power activists]]
| |||