Talk:Universal approximation theorem: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:22, 6 July 2020

Latest revision as of 19:13, 3 June 2024

(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|

{{Maths rating |class=Start |priority=Low |field=applied}}

{{WikiProject Mathematics|priority=Low }}

}}

== Deep variants ==

The two deep variants appear to be somewhat dubious. The citation is just a conference preceding, and it omits the proofs. If an expert knows any more reliable sources that would be ideal <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pabnau|Pabnau]] ([[User talk:Pabnau#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pabnau|contribs]]) 01:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

''Note on above comment: There is no issue with proceedings and they are peer-reviewed and carry heavyweight in the field, at times more than journals.''

Line 9 ⟶ 12:

Hanin and Sellke's work are an improvement over Lu et al's because their result applies to general continuous functions, not just convex ones; furthemorefurthermore they work in the uniformcompact-convergence topology, rather than the L1 topology; furthermore they are narrower. This does still all apply to the ReLU activation function. There has also been another recent paper for general activation functions, but I'm an author on that so I don't know if it's acceptable for me to go around editing Wikipedia pages to mention it... (see also my discussion in 'Out of date', below.) [[Special:Contributions/82.14.199.121|82.14.199.121]] ([[User talk:82.14.199.121|talk]]) 13:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

''The deep section of the page is a mess. I have cleaned up the shallow section to make it more legible but maybe someone can pickup the slack on the second part... it really is badly written.''

== Vague wording ==

Line 64 ⟶ 68:

::::::::: OK, sounds good. [[User:Koertefa|''<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''K'''<span style="color:Teal">œrte</span>'''F'''</span><span style="color:Teal">a</span>'']] [[User talk:Koertefa#top|<span style="color:#2F4F4F">'''{'''<i style="color:Teal">ταλκ</i>'''}'''</span>]] 19:22, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

== To scientific? Not understandable? ==

No, I think the article is just fine. At least do not abbreviate it. Perhaps this text could be moved more to the end of the article and a more elementary instruction could be written in an introduction. [[Special:Contributions/139.14.20.177|139.14.20.177]] ([[User talk:139.14.20.177|talk]]) 11:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)