MediaWiki talk:Common.js/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 09:55, 22 April 2022 edit MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:59, 22 June 2024 edit undo Andrybak (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Template editors 85,709 edits m Andrybak moved page MediaWiki talk:Common.js/Archive May 2007 to MediaWiki talk:Common.js/Archive 5: Template talk:Automatic archive navigator#Later archives are not linked
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 136: ::: That are only the static CSS and JS files, not ones editable on-wiki. No idea if those significantly contribute to the bandwidth usage as well? —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 21:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC) What does it do? At first glance it doesn't seem to have any use outside of other user-scipts (which can just as easily import it themselves.) —''[[User:Ruud Koot\|Ruud]]'' 21:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC) :Also, does <ttcode>Common.js</ttcode> really need [[Object-oriented programming\|OOP]] techniques? The smaller is the better, imho — [[User:Alex Smotrov\|Alex Smotrov]] 21:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC) ::That's just a minor thing, the idea first is to only parse the query string once. second point is to use correct encoding, as some has been using wrong function for that (window.escape()), and to do it transparent. <sub>→[[User:AzaToth\|<span style="color:#773">Aza</span>]][[User_talk:AzaToth\|<span style="color:#359">Toth</span>]]</sub> 21:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC) :::For something unlikely to be used often, wouldn't it be just as well to put the burden on the client side (extra parsing) rather than on the servers (extra bandwidth for longer code)? See below (obviously just an example). --[[User:Splarka\|Splarka]] ([[User_talk:Splarka\|rant]]) 07:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)